|
Post by Sapphire Capital on Jul 6, 2014 4:16:38 GMT 4
Chapter 93A Permits the Recovery of Legal Fees for In-House Counsel's Work
In Holland v. Jachmann, 85 Mass. App. Ct. 292 (2014), the Appeals Court concluded that the trial court has discretion under G.L. c. 93A to award attorneys' fees for legal work performed by in-house counsel. In this case of first impression, the Court noted that the General Counsel "actively participated at all stages of this matter as lead counsel." The Court noted by contrast the case of Arthur D. Little Intl., Inc. v. Dooyang Corp., 995 F.Supp. 217, 225 (D.Mass.1998), where there was no fee award for in-house counsel who "was merely the client," with little participation in the trial proceedings.
|
|
|
Post by ukipa on Jul 16, 2014 17:31:22 GMT 4
This is becoming the norm. Right at this precise moment, law groups are filing claims against "Domino's Pizza" representing "Delivery drivers" for unpaid wages.
Few years ago, law firms sued banks, representing "Mortgage Originators" for unpaid wages.
I am waiting to hear when law groups will be suing "husbands" worldwide, representing "wives" for unpaid wages.
|
|