Post by Sapphire Capital on Sept 18, 2008 20:52:24 GMT 4
Large Shareholders, Board Independence, and Minority Shareholder Rights: Evidence from Europe
Kenneth Kim
SUNY at Buffalo - School of Management
John R. Nofsinger
Washington State University - Department of Finance
P. Kitsabunnarat-Chatjuthamard
August, 25 2008
Buffalo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2008-23
Abstract:
We examine the relation between minority shareholder protection laws, ownership concentration, and board independence. Minority shareholder rights is a country-level governance variable. Ownership structure and board composition represent firm-level governance variables. Prior research hypothesizes anddocuments a negative relation between countries' minority shareholder rights quality and firms' ownership concentration. We introduce the hypothesis that shareholder protection rights and firms' board independence are positively related. When a country's minority shareholder rights are strong, thenminority shareholders should have the legal power to affect board composition. Using a sample of large firms from 14 European countries, we test both hypotheses and find that countries with stronger shareholder protection rights have firms with lower ownership concentrations and with more independent directors, consistent with both hypotheses. We also find evidence that ownership concentration and board independence are negatively related.
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID1254655_code535672.pdf?abstractid=1254655&mirid=3
Kenneth Kim
SUNY at Buffalo - School of Management
John R. Nofsinger
Washington State University - Department of Finance
P. Kitsabunnarat-Chatjuthamard
August, 25 2008
Buffalo Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2008-23
Abstract:
We examine the relation between minority shareholder protection laws, ownership concentration, and board independence. Minority shareholder rights is a country-level governance variable. Ownership structure and board composition represent firm-level governance variables. Prior research hypothesizes anddocuments a negative relation between countries' minority shareholder rights quality and firms' ownership concentration. We introduce the hypothesis that shareholder protection rights and firms' board independence are positively related. When a country's minority shareholder rights are strong, thenminority shareholders should have the legal power to affect board composition. Using a sample of large firms from 14 European countries, we test both hypotheses and find that countries with stronger shareholder protection rights have firms with lower ownership concentrations and with more independent directors, consistent with both hypotheses. We also find evidence that ownership concentration and board independence are negatively related.
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID1254655_code535672.pdf?abstractid=1254655&mirid=3