Post by MMM on May 22, 2011 10:15:42 GMT 4
"An inside look at some complex global financial intelligence case situations where research and analysis, intelligence and tips, brought the following documented support information so answers might be found."
Source: Unwanted Publicity Intelligence, the website(s) [ WWW: upintelligence.multiply.com / E-MAIL: UnwantedPublicity@Gmail.com ]
Spies Use IMF Fraud Overseas
by, ShoreLines
June 9, 2010 11:44:55 [ UPDATE ] Original Publication Date: March 17, 2006
Non-Official Cover ( NOC ) government intelligence agents are sinking independent foreign currency and investment houses using fraud to drive people back into traditional domestic financial institutions.
During the 1990s, offshore capital flight reached epic proportions and became considered by many countries to be an economic threat to national security, but with hidden ties to a host of government agencies, NOC agents operated with impunity - and often times immunity to prosecution - while running sting operations supported by frauds that caused innocent people to lose investments in highly complex offshore ventures cleverly routed back to onshore investment houses and banks swallowing billions that allowed the biggest secret to remain where all fraud monies actually went. Some believe foreign secret government operations were primarily and secretly funded by government treasury recycling of monies derived from earlier frauds to support ongoing NOC agent operations worldwide. Some believe the U.S. Treasury Department Bureau of the Public Debt [ www.publicdebt.treas.gov/ ] had secret divison handling of foreign operation funds. What goes on behind cloaked financial intelligence operational doors? What dirty tricks are used in foreign field operations and who are these NOC agents contracted under business agreements with government intelligence agencies?
An inside look at some complex global financial intelligence case situations where research and analysis, intelligence and tips, brought the following documented support information so answers might be found ( below ):
On August 8, 2004 the Sunday Tribune ( Dublin, Ireland ) interviewed a Non-Official Cover (NOC) foreign government intelligence agent named Gabriel Francis MacEnroe who claimed the United States F.B.I. Portland, Oregon ( USA ) field office called him ( early 2000 ) to contact executives at an independent offshore bank, in The Caribbean, identified as First International Bank of Grenada Limited ( FIBG LTD. ). MacEnroe’s first meeting with bank founder Van A. Brink (fka) Gilbert A. Ziegler began with a jolt, "You're Mr. Ziegler, not Mr. Brink.” According to the Tribune MacEnroe said Brink took exception and claimed MacEnroe worked for the CIA. “I don't work for anyone,” he shot back, which appears as the first of many lies sending an estimated $105-million of the bank depositor’s monies straight into a ditch.
For the Tribune MacEnroe’s story began with, "At the same time, I was called by the FBI's Oregon office, which had found out that I was in Grenada, and asked if I could give them details of the bank. I did and so the agency was able to prosecute Ziegler."
MacEnroe’s tune changed though for FIBG LTD. bank CEO Mark Kennedy with something to the effect that he arranged IMF loams and that the bank could become a project bank for the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and if not he knew of others who might assist the bank depending on what the bank had to offer besides its 10,000-carat hand-carved ruby statue depicting a boy on a water buffalo valued at $20-million some say the bank was originally capitalized with to procure its Grenada bank license.
What else did the bank have for assets? For starters, it had a joint venture contract agreement tying Indonesian legacy heritance certificates of deposit drawn on the UNION BANK OF SWITZERLAND (UBS) valued at $8.7-Billion dollars, which itemized precious bullion metals of gold and platinum in estate holdings of former Indonesia Premier Ir. Soekarno. MacEnroe claimed the bank had no title of it, however records prove the bank indeed held entitlement to receive 50% of trading profits for a period of two (2) years from the estate holder who signed over his Power Of Attorney along with an Irrevocable Deed Of Assignment, Safe-Keeping Receipt, and more.
The Sunday Tribune further reported MacEnroe refuting claims he had not divested FIBG LTD. bank of its assets nor was he arranging for a group of European investors to take over the bank.
In January 2006, evidence surfaced revealing that in 2000 those high-value asset instruments connected to FIBG LTD. bank were ‘heritance certificates of deposits’ and ‘heritance bank guarantees’ for billions in precious metal bullion linked to the Premier Ir. Soekarno Estate and within his friend Mr. A. G. Pringgodigdo estate holdings identified at the UNION BANK OF SWITZERLAND ( UBS AG ) placed under a Mandate With Power of Attorney [ UBS code: A.101.M.1 ] administered by a man named Muchamad Muchlan Buchori.
When Mr. Buchori died in 1984, his son named Muhamad Burhan ( Jakarta, Indonesia ) tried taking control of all Administration books, but his late-father Muchamad Muchlan Buchori had arranged that they ‘not’ pass to ‘his successor’ son Muhamad Burhan, but instead UBS saw an entity named PT GALAXY INDONESIA TRUST with two (2) men named through Premier Ir. Soekarno’s Last Will and Testament that would control the assets. One man was named Dr. Halim (Switzerland) and the other Dr. Edison Damanik (Jakarta, Indonesia), the latter of whom saw to distributing those UBS ‘heritance certificates’ to be handled under very specific instructions on their use. It was at that time when these high-value instrument certificates began surfacing around the World.
After Dr. Damanik passed-away, control over those valuable instrument holdings were passed onto several other parties ( names in files) by his wife in Maryland, USA.
It is believed all original Estate holdings were placed under the control of one ‘committee’ for family members named in a ‘collective leader board’. Further, that Estate funds appear to have not been touched by the appropriate Administrator for the past 35-years because that particular person has not yet claimed the position to do so.
In the meantime a lot of dangerous games appear to have been played regarding these heritance certificates as “worthless”, “fraudulent”, etc. by certain banks including that of ABN-AMRO and UBS alongside Mr. Burhan who ‘had’ access to e-Banking linked to UBS for the Estates. It is believed the heritance committee decided to block his PIN code access as of 2003 due to curious financial business activities.
Mr. Burhan is a close friend of Endang Darmawan, appearing to act as front-runner alongside Ir. Gunardjo, Paimo (aka) F. Danarasa, Halim Dharma Kusuma, M. Damanik, Kho Hian Sui, and Prebon Marshall Yamane.
A group believed to hold committee interest claims Mr. Burhan has been curiously protected by the U.S. National Security Agency ( NSA ) based on accounts tied to a man named Fredrick J. Robinson ( Wichita Falls, Texas, USA ), believed to be an oil consultant for 15-years working out of Bangkok, Thailand.
In early 2000, MacEnroe tried convincing FIBG LTD. bank Board of Director executives the assets they held were worthless, however behind the scenes and out of their view he consorted with FIBG LTD. bank CEO Mark Kennedy to convert one $8.7-billion asset into ‘another’ $8,700,000,000 billion ( USD ) valued asset he saw MacEnroe label as the 'takeover bank' “new asset” planned for re-injecting financial support but under his European client group, which made no promises of providing any returns to former FIBG LTD. bank depositors. [ NOTE: documenting these facts, is an extremely lengthy letter of ( 27-pages ) from the bank officer's letter to the new Acting Chief Executive Officer ( Lawrence A. Jones, a prominent London, UK barrister ) of the bank. ]
Former bank founder, Van Brink, had also drawn the FIBG LTD. bank controlling shareholder’s attention to the facts surrounding the mysterious MacEnroe brokering of the European group bank takeover deal.
Holding what appeared to be a key-position for the FIBG LTD. bank Board of Directors as whether to go with the FBI directed MacEnroe plan to steal the bank just as one $8,700,000,000 billion ( USD ) valued asset had already been done and crush all hope of depositors ever seeing their monies again or not was up to Cynthia Joy ( "Tai” ) Hastey who refused to give-in after what she was made aware of MacEnroe’s weeks of broken promises to the bank, which she viewed as an ‘economic threat’ forced by unreasonable demands on the bank with no guarantee for bank depositors, vendors, and staff just so the MacEnroe plan takeover group could also avail themselves of the other high-value assets already placed in trade from Brazil, trading profits that once returned would clear-up the bank.
Heastey's counter-offer letter was tendered to MacEnroe through FIBG LTD. bank CEO Mark Kennedy who now appears to claim he never passed that to MacEnroe at all. Instead, everyone involved saw Mark Kennedy resign within 24-hours on July 4, 2000.
On July 5th, 2000 the bank board entered negotiations with a London, UK barrister Lawrence A. Jones to take over the FIBG LTD. bank CEO position, which saw him formally accept that position before the Board on July 8th, 2000.
Although the MacEnroe deal was rejected, he never saw to returning the FIBG LTD. bank $8.7-billion dollar placed asset instruments from the Soekarno and Pringgodigdo Estates, which had originally been seen injected into FIBG LTD. bank by a man named Robert Earl Palm ( Canada ).
After Van Brink resigned as FIBG LTD. bank CEO on October 1, 1999 his successor CEO Mark Kennedy immediately met in Grenada with an international oil consultant named Michael K. Gabriel who had co-authored a global economic report with Van Brink earlier. After CEO Kennedy resigned and Lawrence Jones took over as CEO for a brief interim, Michael K. Gabriel became CEO of FIBG LTD. bank and immediately contacted former CEO Mark Kennedy in an effort to resurrect the MacEnroe takeover plan once again.
The 27-page letter written by former FIBG LTD. bank CEO Michael K. Gabriel to former FIBG LTD. bank CEO Lawrence A. Jones, CEO Gabriel describes the MacEnroe takeover plan in detail, mentioning the FIBG LTD. bank $8.7-billion Indonesian asset instruments from UNION BANK of SWITZERLAND (UBS), which MacEnroe saw to having reconstituted (re-built) in Jakarta, Indonesia with others (named in my files) in-conjunction with three ( 3 ) Swiss banks ( i.e. UNION BANK of SWITZERLAND ( UBS AG ), its client-bank CREDIT SUISSE, and the BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS ( BIS ) so the asset instruments would be re-designed in such a way so as to ‘appear different’ and break the link having been previously involved with the FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK OF GRENADA LTD. ( FIBG ) joint venture contract agreements, which thereafter left FIBG unable to lay any legal claim that it was once in joint control over that Indonesia heritance asset instrument. Henceforth, the $8.7-billion asset having been transformed via FBI contractor MacEnroe 's directions, indistinguishable and thereby un-linked FIBG bank history showing such asset instrument tied-in to its past. These acts then could be ‘technically spoken-of’ as a “new asset”, which MacEnroe then led FIBG bank Board of Directors to believe via its mouthpiece CEO Mark Kennedy.
And ‘if’ such a European takeover group ever existed, which MacEnroe later claimed on August 8, 2004 that “there was no European consortium”, then MacEnroe’s fraudulent statements and those of his recruited de facto deputy agent CEO Kennedy were both in furtherance of criminal deception used against FIBG LTD. bank that served to disrupt and cause monetary depositor losses, according to what the U.S. government indictment states against former executives of FIBG LTD. bank – federal criminal defendants, now in Portland, Oregon – that “either the assets were fraudulent or never existed”, but behind-the-scenes - out of public purview - at the helm were U.S. government Non-Official Cover ( NOC ) foreign agents set-upon FIBG LTD. bank, according to the statement of MacEnroe, one of the agents involved in the scheme to put in-play a clever scheme to defraud and deprive FIBG LTD. bank of assets purposely designed via joint venture contract agreements to re-pay its bank depositors within the framework of its ‘scheduled high-yield interest’ as seen on its own “rate sheet”.
In short, not only did FIBG LTD. bank depositors lose their monies, but also FBI - MacEnroe and CIA - Palm led plans served to enhance the appearance of outrageous fraudulent behavior as what the U.S. government indictment appeared to reflect on Van Brink before he died in December 2005.
It’s only obvious, the former FIBG LTD. bank executives and their corporate counsel were conned by U.S. government Non-Official Cover (NOC) intelligence agents, one (1) of whom was placed ‘on loan’ to the Portland, Oregon field office of the F.B.I. according to his latter (08AUG04) statements revealing who called him to send him in on FIBG LTD. bank in Grenada.
Non-Official Cover (NOC) U.S. Government Agents
Rough 10-Step Trading Plan: How It Works
For decades, the U.S. government has used NOC agents where it wishes to deny its foreign actions as was revealed in headline stories in 2006 involving recently linked NOC agents to The White House. The use of NOC agents is nothing new, except to the general public.
U.S. government involvement is kept secret through a cleverly devised chain of attornies who act as ‘cut-outs’ between government intelligence plans and NOC agents sent-in to do government dirty work. Often times, NOC agents appear to be Teflon-coated, where they are excused of any wrong doing and allowed to get away with whatever monies they can scam out of targets during these highly secretive government operations.
In the case of FIBG bank, its network of other banks, and depositor victims the NOC agent government operation is quite simple yet deviously clever to ensure reduction, re-direction, and stemming-of Western country domestic-based capital flight from recognized and controlled ‘domestic registered banks’ and ‘domestic insurance company pension plans’ to stop unrecognized and uncontrolled foreign-based ‘independent off-shore banks’ and ‘independent off-shore insurance companies’. These latter groups, a threat perception recognized by Western intelligence agencies pose a ‘grave threat’ to ‘existing balances of economic national security’ when ‘independent offshore financial institutions network’, then-significant as an independent – yet networked - uncontrollable sources of money flow movements internationally in directions, contrary to what Central Banks and the U.S. Federal Reserve System (FED) would otherwise see controlled whereby this ‘wobble effect’ counter-balances the existing World banking ‘system’.
The ‘system’ or World banking system as it exists today, has its basis conceived on ‘fractional reserve banking’ and its seemingly never-ending expansion of fiat paper currency money supply it uses to float loans, trade, etc. with history dating back to 1928 up through present day proving Western intelligence agencies have protected that well-entrenched heritance / traditional World bank system’ working concept anywhere an independent international banking system pops-up a commodity-based ( e.g. independent banks planning to tie themselves to precious metals, such as a network of gold based banks ) utilizing ‘inverse leverage’ as the anti-thesis of the traditional ‘fractional reserve’ and ‘fiat currencies’ for float. Western intelligence protection is the ‘action arm’ of Foreign Policy directive edicts seen from Executive Branch Level governments ( i.e. Presidents, Prime Ministers, Premiers, Kings, Queens, and other potentates ).
Texas Two Step
The U.S. government foreign policy intelligence plan became operationalized upon Non-Official Cover ( NOC ) foreign agents being sent-in to initially ‘inject evidence’ of high-value asset instruments and later ‘withdraw evidence’ tied to FIBG bank and its network of IBC and satellite constellation of sub-banks pooling depositor monies lost across that spectrum into black-hole trading programs claimed by both NOC agents. The plan was nicknamed, “Texas Two Step”.
High-Value Asset Instrument Distribution
In 1984, specific high-value asset instruments were sent by Southeast Asia and South Pacific interests to Europe and from there to India where they were turned around and sent to the Far East.
In 1986, these same high-value asset instruments appeared from Europe in the Middle East.
Crime History Of High-Value Asset Instruments
In July 1991, these same high-value asset instruments along with ‘others’ ( e.g. 88 certificates from Japan alone ), other foreign and domestic country transaction obligations, to include one (1) $278-Billion dollar certificate, $45-Billion dollar certificate, etc., etc. ) were confiscated in Texas (USA). See, e.g. U.S. District Court (Austin, Texas) USA vs. Edison Damanik, CASE NO.: A-91-200-M and CASE NO.: A-91-CR-00107 (aka) 1:91-CR-107; and, U.S. District Court ( Dallas, Texas ) USA vs. Tommy Lee Buckley, Lewis Wilborn Driver ( Giddings, Texas ), et al.
On April 1, 1992 AUSA Price requested - on behalf of the U.S. government - all federal criminal charges ‘dismissed’ against Dr. Edison Damanik ( Indonesia ) eleven ( 11 ) days after a mysterious lawyer named Barry E. Burke ( Chicago, Illinois ) came out of retirement, was added as co-counsel to Stephen M. Orr, Esq. in the defense of Dr. Damanik defense case.
With more than five ( 5 ) federal felony arrests - made by U.S. Secret Service agents in at least two (2) Texas cities ( Dallas and Austin, Texas ) - the high-value asset instruments case was dismissed by the U.S. government after 9-months. Who was that mystery lawyer from Chicago, Illinois who - without so much as ever having made one (1) pleading - saw this huge federal criminal case dismissed on a Motion by the U.S. government out of the clear blue sky?
Just after the Damanik federal case was dismissed in 1992, the former Soviet Union KGB identified a man named Robert Earl Palm as a U.S. government Non-Official Cover ( NOC ) foreign agent involved in a currency exchange fraud where he was seen putting ‘high-value asset instruments’ into play.
The KGB provided official Russia, Ukraine, Poland, Finland, and US documents faxed by Robert Palm, now available on the internet, linking him to a $15,000,000,000 billion ( USD ) trading program named “YOKAMURA” in a case involving COLE-TAYLOR BANK ( Chicago, Illinois ), WINDOW TRADING LTD., CARTESA FINANCE ( Switzerland, Liechtenstein, and in Curitiba, Brazil ), and others involved.
Today, the Russian government claims Robert Palm spurred into action Russia’s capital flight problem over a 5-year period that saw to removing nearly $1,000,000,000,000 trillion - in USD value terms - where later upon Russian request, the U.S. government called-in a firm named KROLL ASSOCIATES to assist the Russian government in tracking down ‘where their money went’. KROLL was never able to locate or recovery any of Russia’s missing Trillion dollars. According to The Wall Street Journal ( July 23, 1993 ) report, Robert Earl Palm claimed in 1991 that he was the representative of UNITED NATIONAL REPUBLIC BANK (UNRB) of Russia holding assets of $1,895,000,000,000 trillion dollars in ( USD ) value. The Russia government indicated their records showed no bank ‘by that name’ registered ‘in Russia’ at ‘that time’.
In 1994, 2-years after the Dr. Edison Damanik case saw his high-value asset instruments ‘checked out of’ the Austin, Texas U.S. District Court evidence safe - based on a special request by AUSA Price on behalf of the U.S. government, some of them re-appeared ‘again’ in a Sydney, Australia federal criminal case naming Anthony Hamod with $78,000,000,000 billion + in ( USD ) high-value asset instruments. As in the Damanik case, Anthony Hamod was arrested and federal criminal charges against him dismissed months later. But, the Australian federal court evidence points to Anthony Hamod claiming he met with Dr. Edison Damanik in Switzerland and that the instruments came from a Damanik controlled Indonesia company named PT GALAXY INDONESIA. The Australian federal court ordered that those high-value asset instruments be released back to Anthony Hamod in 1996, however the record is unclear as to whether Hamod ever received those instruments over Australian federal law enforcement objections.
In 1998, 2-years after the Anthony Hamod case in Australia, Robert Earl Palm shows up with his high-value asset instruments again, but this time in Canada where they were sent down to the Caribbean for injection into the First International Bank of Grenada Ltd. ( FIBG ) bank asset structure through joint venture contract agreements with international business companies, which included SHERWOOD INVESTMENTS LIMITED ( Bahamas ) tied to Robert Earl Palm.
In an interview with FIBG bank founder and first CEO Van A. Brink, he met Robert Earl Palm in-person and remained with him for several days in Victoria, British Columbia, Canada where Bob Palm tried schooling Van Brink on how those high-value asset instruments might be used offshore to obtain onshore investor monies worldwide.
Brink said, “Bob Palm’s assistant [ Jason Matthew Walsh (aka) Matt Walsh ] wheeled a small file cabinet over to Palm who removed a ‘few’ billion dollars worth of bank financial instrument certificates and threw them in my lap saying, ‘If the bank does well with these, I’ve $2,000,000,000,000 trillion ( USD ) more right here’.” Interestingly, the June 23, 1993 Wall Street Journal newspaper article read, "he [ Robert Palm ] was the representative of UNITED NATIONAL REPUBLIC BANK (UNRB) of Russia holding assets of $1,895,000,000,000 trillion dollars in ( USD ) value."
How The Odds Work: Two-Steps to 10-Steps
While the Texas Two Step may be all that’s seen from Fanx I in Maryland, USA, NOC agent field operations identify at least ten ( 10 ) stages for their operation to have any success at all.
A list of basics, understood to work with most small independent offshore banks, see:
Convincing Target Banks
One ( 1 ): send-in the first (1st) Non-Official Cover (NOC) foreign agent who sees to injecting – without signing anything dealing with - high-value asset instruments that read (on the face of the instruments) in (USD) values worth billions ‘each’. Announce to the small independent offshore bank executives that the instruments can be verified by bank corporate counsel using due diligence. That after the bank is satisfied, placement of those asset instruments into special / secret trading programs will net the banks incredibly high rates of return to the tune of hundreds if not thousands of percentage points in returned trading profits for them. Claim the assets as well as trading programs are known only to government central banks or incredibly huge organizations kept secret for decades so typical retail and commercial banks never really know how much profit in the billions are actually being made on pooling depositor’s monies in such trading programs where the minimum entrant fees start at $100-million and go up. Show support documentation that tends to lend credence demonstrating asset instrument legitimacy where even heads of state appear signed verifying such as true.
IBC Account Conduits
Two ( 2 ): the NOC agent arranges with the banks to receive depositor’s millions for ‘broker transaction fees’ by suggesting to banks they “network” together, and for the bank to successfully participate it should consider linking-up with other independent offshore banks by banding together as a network of satellite banks to invest all depositor account monies for these assets to be used in high-yield trading programs. By the banks tying themselves to these asset instruments in joint venture contract agreements with trade representatives of international business companies (IBCs) the bank will automatically be set up to receive its trading profits in a variety of ways, which is basically the foundation each bank established for themselves to be conduits of money being passed through each other. All the banks did was see money compiled from depositor monies for the ‘trading broker (NOC agent) transaction fees’ and the ‘trading program entrant fees’ paid so the banks could begin participation in the planned receipt of what the NOC agent had convinced them to expect, which was high-yield trading profits. Depositor monies were sent into bank-client’s international business company (IBC) accounts, and from there, through a series of the trading broker’s (NOC agent’s) international business company numbered accounts. Meanwhile these targeted banks, now all linked together through bank wire money transfers, were convinced the trading process had begun so, they could see depositors ‘scheduled high-yield interest rates of return based on deposit size’ paid on-time. The banks counted their trading program profit chickens before the asset instrument egg placements into these ‘trading programs saw to hatching profits by the banks funding additional projects in order to scoop-up yet other high-value assets supplied by the NOC agent (trading broker) for placement into yet other high-yield trading programs. The trading program congame on the banks was then in full swing, as were depositor monies flying in the wings based on NOC agent commercial bank paper trading program profit promises to the banks sending money in and out of other banks to accomplish their goals too.
Strategic Delays: High-Value Trading Program Deals Fall Through
Three ( 3 ): as trading program interval times come and go, according to NOC agent ( trading broker ) claims, banks are provided what appear to be plausible excuses as to why the trading program profit returns to the banks are taking longer as the most common excuse of all is that the trading profits are sent into escrow accounts handled between big banks and lawyers before disbursements can be legitimately realized by the trading broker’s (NOC agent’s) client banks awaiting pay-outs where the infamous word “soon” is often relayed all the way down the line in furtherance of the NOC agent fraud against the bank, which never appears seen by bank customer’s, just what ‘they’ hear coming from the banks where their monies were deposited. If the bank tires of excuses and demands their monies back, simply offer them additional asset instruments in the millions as an incentive to just hang-on a while longer until the trading profits clear escrow accounts in a month or so.
News Tips Worry Bank Deals
Four ( 4 ): simply place a rumor in the financial business world that specific bank(s) are experiencing difficulties returning interest to depositors, which will see the targeted bank(s) desperately scrambling to answer attorney letters as the beginning stages of lawsuits from depositors. In that wake, slip the first (1st) NOC agent out of the picture entirely, making him unavailable ( overseas on business but returning “soon”) to return calls to the bank(s).
Changing Of The Guards ( NOC Pea & Shell Game )
Five ( 5 ): send-in the second ( 2nd ) NOC agent as a highly-respected trading and/or securities consultant recommended by one of the inside bank consultants, recruited earlier to perform ‘authorized signatory functions’ over the high-value asset instruments structured within joint-venture contract agreements signed by the bank with other IBCs. Offer the bank a potential bailout from an unidentified cash-cow group by stating that it is a secret consortium of European businessmen interested in buying-up independent banks with the help of the trading consultant (NOC agent). Freely consult with the primary bank (for a network of sub-banks) chief executive officer that the bank problems could be why it isn’t receiving trading profits as promised. Caution the executive that they must act fast because if the high-value asset instruments are counterfeit, fraudulent, or in any way worthless by means of perhaps yet an unknown secret secondary assignment the bank may have known nothing about earlier, that the chief executive officer may end-up taking the fall and going to prison for a very long time unless something isn’t done right away to counter it to save the bank(s). Again, freely offer to discreetly check the legitimacy of ‘all high-value instrument documentation’ only to be reviewed by very secret experts in Europe who happen to owe this NOC agent consultant special favors he can call-in.
Six ( 6 ): the bank tiring of NOC agent #1 not returning their calls, adverse news publicity, and the first lawsuit filed by a depositor over lost monies, will instantly become a prime target of U.S. government investigative bodies. All NOC agent #2 does is makes his or her self, available to assist the government in any way they possible, meanwhile all the bank(s) asset instruments are in the possession of NOC agent #2.
Cultivating Bank Mules
Seven ( 7 ): NOC agent #2 calls the bank executive to Europe claiming what he discovered cannot be discussed over the phone. Once the bank officer is in Europe at the designated hotel meeting place, the trading consultant ( NOC agent #2 ) informs the bank executive that ‘he’ ( the ‘bank executive’ ) is in big trouble with the U.S. government and that if he does not fully cooperate with him he’ll eventually be charged with international fraud and money-laundering and then nothing can be done for him or the bank. Once the bank executive is convinced that it’s either the consultant’s (NOC agent’s) way or no way he’ll have been primed and ready for the next stage.
Convince the bank executive that only one (1), possibly two (2) groups of the bank high-value asset instruments can possibly be worked, but only with his dedicated cooperation to see the bank saved as well as himself but that only he (the executive) can guarantee his own success by the level of cooperation he’s willing to extend. Once the bank executive agrees then NOC agent #2 convinces him to sign a ‘personal confidentiality agreement’ with the consultant, which also makes him a part of the secret European consortium answerable to prosecution should he ever decide to breech such a contract in the future.
With the lead bank executive’s cooperation contacting the authorized signatory on behalf of the bank holding the specific high-value asset instruments that are designated by NOC agent #2 as being “workable” the bank executive and NOC agent #2 ( consultant ) go forward to see to the removal and reconstitution of what had been previously tied to the bank(s) as high-value asset instrument commercial bank paper(s).
Convincing Several Holders Of The Same Asset
Eight ( 8 ): NOC agent #2 contacts the true holder of the high-value asset instruments and calls a meeting with the actual asset holders, explaining that they are about to lose their entire assets behind the unscrupulous financial business deeds of an independent offshore bank currently seen in news reports, under federal investigation, and about to be seized by the tiny government in which it is currently situated. Indicate that having been concerned by what was about to unfold, steps were taken to protect their assets, and that a plan is available to them should they care to act quickly before they lose everything. That the plan can only be successful through their full cooperation and that all NOC agent #2 (consultant) wishes from his work is his usual and customary fee of one percent (1%) on the amount involved where portions of that fee may be spread out over a schedule of cash, monetary instruments, and re-investment into a Trust benefiting all interested parties over a lengthy period of time. That through a careful process of transforming previously held asset instruments with the holding bank and its client bank through another Estate Fund Trust controlled by their own collective Board members that such would alleviate unnecessary publicity and the loss of their assets already in-place at the current time. And, finally that none of their banks need be concerned that it is only a collective Board decision to re-assign assets while allowing existing banks to maintain current governance over the same assets with minimal loss.
Bank in Liechtenstein Trust ( BIL ) fund accounts for NOC agent #2 and participant Trustee and legal guardians would see immediate benefits to establish all that necessary arrangements for receipt of such a transaction entrusted to them by NOC agent #2.
CIA NOC Agents On-Loan To FBI: Heavy Tippers
Nine ( 9 ): NOC agent #2 notifies his handler (Washington DC metroplex area) that any and/or all traces of the high-value asset instruments have been successfully shielded from view and that the FBI may now proceed with new information as to who specifically are not to become targets of a federal investigation and should be called as cooperative witnesses to testify against who NOC agent #2 identifies as criminal co-conspirators causing depositor’s monies lost based on fraudulent claims to high-value asset instruments bank executives have no proof ever existed, and for the bank executives seeing to the establishment of IBC bank money transfer accounts as nothing more than money-laundering devices.
NOC Agents
1.) Robert Earl Palm, under U.S. government sanction for his planned cooperation, saw to injecting the vast majority of all high-value asset instruments into FIBG LTD. bank via joint venture agreement contracts involving international business companies ( IBC ) he controlled - but not necessarily named on - with his vociferous claim to Van A. Brink and others, these assets would be placed into trading programs netting extremely high-yield interest trading profits back to FIBG LTD. bank, in-exchange for which he saw receipt of millions of FIBG LTD. bank and it’s network of sub-banks depositor’s monies going into numbered accounts. Everyone wanted to place money in the banks offering high-yield returns in Robert Earl Palm’s claimed trading program profit pay-offs to these banks; and,
2.) Gabriel Francis MacEnroe, under U.S. government sanction for his planned cooperation, threatened FIBG LTD. bank former CEO Mark Kennedy ( Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada ) to cooperate in seeing FIBG LTD. bank high-value asset instruments separated from their past with assistance of authorized signatory William Randolph (“Bill”) Davis ( Chino Hills, California, USA ) and his associate Lewis ( “Louis”) Trotta ( San Francisco, California ) whom met with Alan Eigher in Jakarta, Indonesia for said Indonesian high-value asset instruments conversion process to begin.
The MacEnroe-FBI extortion against FIBG LTD. bank CEO Mark Kennedy worked, as did the transformation, details of which are too lengthy to describe, but enabled MacEnroe to collect his usual and customary one-percent (1%) commission fees by arranging it all.
FIBG LTD. bank Board of Directors were told a so-called “new asset” seen by MacEnroe within his European takeover group was willing to act in an effort to shore-up their bank, however MacEnroe had already instructed FIBG LTD. bank CEO Kennedy to divest itself of that $8.7-billion high-value asset instrument earlier without other members of the Bank Board of Directors knowledge. In-fact, the “new asset” was basically derived from the $8.7-billion FIBG LTD. bank high-value asset instrument linked to Indonesian heritance Estates tied by their Holder’s authorized signatory holding Power Of Attorney at act as was demonstrated in a Joint Venture contract agreement between international business companies (IBCs) GENESIS HOLDINGS CORP. (Grenada) and its director Richard W. Downes who was also Chairman of the Board of Directors for FIBG LTD. bank, SHERWOOD INVESTMENTS (BAHAMAS) LTD. directed by Robert Earl Palm, BURL HOWARD SECURITIES CORP. directed by Robert Earl Palm, et al. and its CEO Alexander Gilbert Baraona, and FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK OF GRENADA LIMITED bank.
After FIBG LTD. bank first CEO Brink resigned on October 1, 1999 and his successor CEO Kennedy resigned on July 4, 2000 and after his successor Acting CEO Lawrence A. Jones stepped aside, FIBG LTD. bank was seen with CEO Michael K. Gabriel contacted former CEO Kennedy who briefed him on what had transpired with the MacEnroe deal. CEO Gabriel then tried to salvage the MacEnroe deal when he wrote a 27-page letter to Lawrence A. Jones outlining, amongst other things, the MacEnroe deal once again, but on August 11, 2000 the Grenada government stepped-in and took control of FIBG LTD. bank, and went on to appoint two (3) Grenada government assigned Statutory Interim Administrators (Garvey Louison and Errol Thomas) in succession, and then appointed a Liquidator named Marcus A. Wide of PriceWaterhouseCoopers (Nova Scotia, Canada).
The Liquidator presented three ( 3 ) Statutory Interim Reports where the last report (July 2003) indicated no evidence existed that FIBG LTD. bank ever held any high-value asset instruments.
In January 2004, three ( 3 ) FIBG bank executives Robert John Skirving, Laurent E. Barnabe, and Rita Brunges Regale were arrested by FBI agents on charges of fraud and money laundering stemming from a federal indictment alleging the bank made fraudulent claims to having had high-value asset instruments where no evidence was found to exist.
On May 28, 2004 two ( 2 ) more FIBG LTD. bank executives, whom included Van A. Brink, were also arrested by the FBI agents on charges of fraud and money laundering stemming from a federal indictment alleging the bank made fraudulent claims to having had high-value asset instruments where no evidence was found to exist.
On December 10, 2005 FIBG LTD. bank founder and first CEO Van A. Brink died prior to the group trial set for 2007.
====
1990 - 2006
Several U.S. federal ‘criminal’ and ‘civil’ cases (shown below) name Gabriel Francis MacEnroe who claims he can arrange IMF loans and bail out troubled banks by seeing them turned into IMF project banks - one of several cons he uses to gain his usual and customary fees of approximately one percent (1%) for arranging such transactions. Based on others who highly recommend him, his fees are consistently paid up-front. Even more consistently though, are hundreds of millions lost by independent investors after MacEnroe leaves the stage.
One particular case ( further below ) details activities from 1990 - 1992 where the FBI coordinated different roles for its contractors, named:
Mercedes Travis, Esq. ( ex-wife of, Robert Chiari );
Gabriel Francis MacEnroe; and,
William P. Caraluzzi, Esq.
Worked in-concert, this case saw Ms. Travis’ law client John J. Voigt, et al. charged with federal criminal fraud, money-laundering, tax evasion, and criminal forfeiture after client’s investment monies disappeared as Mr. MacEnroe ( at an office in Stamford, Connecticut ) saw them earmarked for META TRADING AND FINANCIAL INTERNATIONAL ( MTFI ) placement into a trading program claimed tied to The Holy Roman Catholic Church through the EURO-AMERICAN MONEY FUND TRUST ( EAMFT ), headquartered in Europe with representative offices in the U.S. The scheme saw the name of the KNIGHTS OF MALTA tossed-about in claims they were participating too.
Over 2-1/2 years on this case alone MacEnroe and others dealing with EAMFT saw loan applicants and investor’s lose approximately $18,500,000 million (USD) based on "self-liquidating" loans designed to repay what were supposedly tied to Master Collateral Commitments (MCC) involving high-value asset instruments as commercial bank paper for entry into ‘trading programs’ to net high-yield interest after supposedly poling funds of their investors.
Reference
caselaw.findlaw.com/us-3rd-circuit/1210029.html
FBI contractor Gabriel MacEnroe ( as above ) has seen many-many U.S. criminal and civil cases involving monetary loss from fraud surrounding his and his named companies financial business deals, named in:
- - - -
1992 – (CIVIL) Dallas, Texas [CASE NO.: 3:92-CV-00033 or 3:92-CV-00331, naming: “GF MacEnroe” and “Abbey Finance & Mortgage Company Limited” (United Kingdom), William P Caraluzzi, Ralph A. Anderskow, et al.; $367,500.00 Fraud];
- -
1993 – ( CRIMINAL ) Trenton, New Jersey [CASE NO.: 3:93-CR-00300-0, naming: Gabriel MacEnroe, William P. Caraluzzi, Ralph A. Anderskow, Mercedes Travis, Solis Alevy, Donald Anchors, et al.; $18,500,000.00 money-maundering and fraud. See, e.g. [ vls.law.vill.edu/locator/3d/July1996/96a1344p.txt ]
- -
1998 – ( CIVIL ) Newark, New Jersey [ BANKRUPTCY CASE NO.: 98-44940, naming: “Commercial Capital Establishment ( Liechtenstein )”, “CCE”, Willy Farah, et al.; In RE: 1995 $60,000,000.00 investment fraud ];
- -
1998 – ( CIVIL ) New York, New York [NASD ( National Association of Securities Dealers ) CASE DATE: 01SEP98, In RE: Bear Stearns & Co. Inc. vs. “Gabriel MacEnroe”, “Commercial Capital Establishment”, “CCE”, et al.];
- -
1999 – ( CIVIL ) Newark, New Jersey [ BANKRUPTCY ADVERSARY CASE NO.: 99-3010, naming: “Commercial Capital Establishment”, “CCE”, Willy Farah, et al. ( Total Claims: $46,698,723.30 ) ];
- -
1999 – ( CRIMINAL ) Ft. Lauderdale, Florida [ CASE NO.: 8:00-CR-00027, USA v. Womack, et al.; naming: “Gabriel MacEnroe”, et al.; $56,000,000.00 money-laundering and fraud ];
- -
1999 - (Criminal) Minneapolis, Minnesota [ United States of America v. Howard Eugene Liner, CR NO.: 04-2497, naming Gabriel MacEnroe, Christopher Patrick Heron, Larry Ewers, et al.]
Reference
openjurist.org/435/f3d/920/united-states-v-liner
openjurist.org/419/f3d/1
- -
2000 – ( CIVIL ) Newark, New Jersey [ CASE NO.: 2:00-CV-00952, Raymond Keith Richards v. PNC Bank N.A.; naming: “Gabriel MacEnroe” and “Commercial Capital Establishment” ( Vaduz, Liechtenstein and St. Gallen, Switzerland ), et al.; $60,000,000.00 Diversity Fraud, See, e.g. www.njusao.org/files/fa0420_r.htm ];
- -
2000 – ( CRIMINAL ) Greenville, South Carolina [ CASE No.: 8:00-CR-00697, naming: “Gabriel MacEnroe”, Joseph R. Silvestri, David Alan Morgenstern, Vernon W. Shiflett, et al.; Charges: conspiracy to defraud the government and aiding and abetting wire fraud $52,000,000.00 ]; Gabriel Francis MacEnroe status ( June 20, 2003 ) Failure To Appear, Warrant issued, foreign-based U.S. federal fugitive, See e.g. [ www.frauddigest.com/indictments/USA_v_MacEnroe_et_al_COMPLAINT.pdf and www.savannahnow.com/stories/111002/LOCPonziScheme.shtml ];
- -
2001 – ( CIVIL ) San Diego, California [ CASE NO.: 8:01-CV-01085, naming “Gabriel MacEnroe”, Ralph King, David Alan Morgenstern, Virgil Womack, Byron Z. Moldo, Robbie Stevens, Dante Orgolini, Peter A. Davidson, Scott J. Rein Esq., Patrick J. Evans Esq., Thomas R. Sestanovich Esq., Rein Evans & Sestanovich LLP, (fka) Dressler Rein Evans & Sestanovich LLP, law partnership and successor to Dressler, Rein, Evans & Sestanovich LLP; Securities Exchange Act ];
- -
2002 – ( CRIMINAL ) New Orleans, Louisiana [ CASE NO.: (UNDER SEAL), naming: “Gabriel MacEnroe”, et al.; In RE: San Diego, California CASE NO.: 8:01-CV-01085 ( above ) ];
- -
2002 – ( CRIMINAL ) Albuquerque, New Mexico [ CASE: USA vs. Powell Onen P’Ojwong ( West Nile, Uganda and London, UK ), Ian Burns ( London, UK and Barcelona, Spain ), “Gabriel MacEnroe” (St. Gallen, Switzerland), Ralph King, et al.; See, e.g. U.S. Attorney John Kelly ( In RE: $4-million investment trading program, City Of Clovis New Mexico ( City Manager, Terri McCully ), and LOMORO SECURITIES account at CITIBANK Espana ( Spain ); Money-Laundering and Wire Fraud ]; and,
- -
2003 – ( CIVIL ) Dallas, Texas [ CASE NO.: 3:03-CV-01016, naming: “Gabriel MacEnroe” and “Commercial Capital Establishment”, et al. - Judgment: $2,282,287.50 Failure To Pay balance of $10,000,000.00 awarded by NASD ( National Association of Securities Dealers ) to BEAR STEARNS & CO. INC.; CASE ( 01SEP98 ) ]
- - - -
Interested parties who encounter Gabriel MacEnroe were encouraged to contact:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE – Criminal Division
10th and Constitution Avenue North West
Washington, DC 20530
USA
TEL: (202) 616-9871
CONTACT: Mr. James Pavlock
- - - -
Prior to Gabriel MacEnroe having occupied an office in Stamford, Connecticut during the early-1990s, he occupied another office in Beverly Hills, California during the late 1980s that was seen shut down in the wake of missing investor client monies after a complaint spurred an investigation by the U.S. Office Of Thrift Supervision.
MacEnroe is man with at least three ( 3 ) passport citizenships who is said to be a prolific writer and record keeper of information on almost everything discussed with him by anyone, which may speak loudly as to why the F.B.I. has used him internationally and in the United States as their financial business informant on more than just one (1) occasion. MacEnroe’s rise to infamy through nefarious financial business activities has built the small fortune he’s been able to amass during 15-years of dedicated but most curious service to governments around the World.
He is what some consider a Non-Official Cover ( NOC ) government intelligence foreign agent seen claiming to others that he can help provide International Monetary Fund ( IMF ) loans to banks, can arrange private placement investments for involvement in high-yield trading programs, provide credit enhancements, etc., etc.
In October 2000, MacEnroe saw a U.S. federal criminal indictment ( see copy of indictment further below ) against him officially report his claims that he operates with the following U.S. government agencies, to wit:
U.S. Treasury Department;
Federal Bureau of Investigation ( F.B.I. );
Central Intelligence Agency ( C.I.A. );
National Security Agency ( N.S.A. ); and,
Federal Reserve Board ( FED ).
Gabreil Francis MacEnroe's criminal indictment also revealed his father ( a London, UK barrister assigned as Trustee for the now-late John Paul Getty Jr. II ) had been a collector of information for the F.B.I. as well.
EAMFT represented it had large sums of money available for private investment lending and this was one means by which The Holy Roman Catholic Church ( Vatican ) made considerable money from the interest earned on loans for funding some of its operations.
MacEnroe had a number of proposed loans at the time for various projects of people who had been presented to him seeking loans. The people put up ‘advanced fees’ to the EAMFT group, and after due diligence completion, loan documents were entered into. No projects were funded by EAMFT because the group who said it represented EAMFT ran off with the money instead, which was never recovered.
MacEnroe’s 1991 business partner Ralph A. Anderskow and John J. Voigt were arrested, convicted, sentenced to federal prison.
Gabriel F. MacEnroe, William P. Caraluzzi, and Mercedes Travis walked away free.
The $18,500,000.00 was never recovered.
Ralph A. Anderskow was released from federal prison in 2002.
John J. Voigt has his federal prison release set for 2007.
The F.B.I. Atlantic City, New Jersey field office saw FBI Special Agent Alvin Powell investigate the case and handle its contractors, assets and informants.
Powell retired on what was believed to be a disability pension due to a back injury.
Alvin Powell
414 Tryon Avenue [ street name, may be: “Tyron” ]
Englewood, New Jersey 07631
USA
TEL: (201) 816 - 8290
Highlights ( below ) of the EURO-AMERICAN MONEY FUND TRUST ( EAMFT ) and META TRADING AND FINANCIAL INTERNATIONAL ( MTFI ) federal investigation case from the eyes of the federal Court:
Criminal Docket No.: 3:93-CR-300-0
Original Case No.: 93-CR-00300-ALL
Revised Case No.: 93-CR-00300-GEB
Case Filed: 06/14/93
Case Assigned to: Judge Garrett E. Brown, Jr.
U.S. District Court
District of New Jersey (Trenton, New Jersey)
USA v. VOIGT, et al.
John J. Voigt (1), defendant
Ralph A. Anderskow (2), defendant
Mercedes Travis (3), defendant
Solis Alevy (aka) Skip Alevy (5), defendant
Donald Anchors (4), defendant
. . . [EDITED-OUT FOR BREVITY] . . .
- - - -
Appeal:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
______________
No. 95-5093
______________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
RALPH A. ANDERSKOW, Appellant
______________
No. 95-5094
______________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
DONALD ANCHORS, Appellant
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of New Jersey
(D.C. Criminal Nos. 93-cr-00300-02 & 93-cr-00300-03)
_______________
Argued January 25, 1996
Before: COWEN and SAROKIN, Circuit Judges, and POLLAK, District Judge
(Filed July 9, l996)
_______________
Richard F. X. Regan, Esq. (ARGUED)
Hayden, Perle and Silber
1500 Harbor Boulevard
Weehawken, New Jersey 07087
COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT ANDERSKOW
- - - -
Michael M. Mustokoff, Esq. (ARGUED)
Teresa N, Cavenagh, Esq.
Judith E. Baylinson, Esq.
Duane, Morris & Heckscher
One Liberty Place
Philadelphia, PA 19103
COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT ANCHORS
- - - -
Allan Tananbaum (ARGUED)
Faith Hochberg
United States Attorney
970 Broad Street
Newark, New Jersey 07102
COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE
_______________
OPINION OF THE COURT
_______________
COWEN, Circuit Judge.
Ralph Anderskow and Donald Anchors appeal from judgments of conviction and sentence entered by the District Court for the District of New Jersey. The convictions arise out of their participation, along with several other co-conspirators, in the Euro-American Money Fund Trust (the "Trust"), an entity that was used to perpetrate a pernicious advance-fee scheme. Over a 3-year period, the Trust bilked unsuspecting loan applicants and investors out of over $18-million dollars. Both defendants raise evidentiary and legal sufficiency challenges. We will affirm the judgments of conviction.
I.
John Voigt was the mastermind of a scheme to obtain fees from loan applicants and potential investors for nonexistent loans and investments. At the heart of this scheme was the Trust. Voigt fabricated a fictitious genealogy for the Trust, claiming that it was a long-established European financial institution affiliated with the Catholic Church and the Knights of Malta, and that it had access to billions of dollars. For two and one-half years brokers for the Trust would recount this false genealogy to unsuspecting loan applicants and investors, who would part with substantial fees in return for "self-liquidating" loans (loans that repaid themselves) and "Master Collateral Commitments" ("MCCs"), allegedly a special form of commercial paper available only to banks.
Voigt benefited from the cooperation of several co-conspirators, including Anderskow, a partner at a Chicago law firm who also was a certified public accountant. He was hired as the Trust's lawyer in the Chicago area, and his credentials helped provide the Trust with an appearance of legitimacy, which facilitated its attempts to lure loan applicants and potential investors. Anderskow's primary responsibility was providing guarantees to borrowers on behalf of the Trust and maintaining a client escrow account into which advance fees were deposited. Anderskow would immediately distribute fees that had been deposited into his escrow account according to Voigt's instructions, which violated the terms of contracts entered into with the loan applicants and investors. For his role in the Trust Anderskow received $995,000 in compensation.
In January of 1991 appellant Anchors was hired for the position of "loan oversight officer." Somewhat akin to a customer relations manager, Anchors was primarily responsible for responding to questions and complaints from customers of the Trust. Over time, Anchors devoted much of his time to placating loan applicants who had paid advance fees and were calling with increasing frequency to inquire as to the status of their loans. Anchors eventually responded to several hundred calls each month, assuring disgruntled borrowers that their loans were about to be funded. Eventually, Anchors began to tell some applicants that other loans had been funded, which he knew was untrue. Anchors received $325,000 for his participation in the Trust.
In June of 1993, a federal grand jury issued a 26-count indictment against Anderskow, Anchors, and their 3 co-conspirators - Voigt, Mercedes Travis, and Solis Alevy.
Alevy entered a plea of guilty, and became a government witness.
Subsequently, the grand jury issued a 28-count superseding indictment against the remaining 4 defendants, charging Anderskow and Anchors with conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud, and money laundering, and bringing criminal money laundering forfeiture allegations against them.
After a 3-month trial, a jury convicted Anderskow on all charges except 2 counts of wire fraud.
Anchors was convicted of conspiracy and 7 counts of wire fraud, but was acquitted of 7 other counts of wire fraud and 2 counts of money laundering.
Anderskow and Anchors were sentenced, respectively, to terms of imprisonment of 78 and 32-months.
This appeal followed.
. . . [EDITED-OUT FOR BREVITY] . . .
Source: Unwanted Publicity Intelligence, the website(s) [ WWW: upintelligence.multiply.com / E-MAIL: UnwantedPublicity@Gmail.com ]
Spies Use IMF Fraud Overseas
by, ShoreLines
June 9, 2010 11:44:55 [ UPDATE ] Original Publication Date: March 17, 2006
Non-Official Cover ( NOC ) government intelligence agents are sinking independent foreign currency and investment houses using fraud to drive people back into traditional domestic financial institutions.
During the 1990s, offshore capital flight reached epic proportions and became considered by many countries to be an economic threat to national security, but with hidden ties to a host of government agencies, NOC agents operated with impunity - and often times immunity to prosecution - while running sting operations supported by frauds that caused innocent people to lose investments in highly complex offshore ventures cleverly routed back to onshore investment houses and banks swallowing billions that allowed the biggest secret to remain where all fraud monies actually went. Some believe foreign secret government operations were primarily and secretly funded by government treasury recycling of monies derived from earlier frauds to support ongoing NOC agent operations worldwide. Some believe the U.S. Treasury Department Bureau of the Public Debt [ www.publicdebt.treas.gov/ ] had secret divison handling of foreign operation funds. What goes on behind cloaked financial intelligence operational doors? What dirty tricks are used in foreign field operations and who are these NOC agents contracted under business agreements with government intelligence agencies?
An inside look at some complex global financial intelligence case situations where research and analysis, intelligence and tips, brought the following documented support information so answers might be found ( below ):
On August 8, 2004 the Sunday Tribune ( Dublin, Ireland ) interviewed a Non-Official Cover (NOC) foreign government intelligence agent named Gabriel Francis MacEnroe who claimed the United States F.B.I. Portland, Oregon ( USA ) field office called him ( early 2000 ) to contact executives at an independent offshore bank, in The Caribbean, identified as First International Bank of Grenada Limited ( FIBG LTD. ). MacEnroe’s first meeting with bank founder Van A. Brink (fka) Gilbert A. Ziegler began with a jolt, "You're Mr. Ziegler, not Mr. Brink.” According to the Tribune MacEnroe said Brink took exception and claimed MacEnroe worked for the CIA. “I don't work for anyone,” he shot back, which appears as the first of many lies sending an estimated $105-million of the bank depositor’s monies straight into a ditch.
For the Tribune MacEnroe’s story began with, "At the same time, I was called by the FBI's Oregon office, which had found out that I was in Grenada, and asked if I could give them details of the bank. I did and so the agency was able to prosecute Ziegler."
MacEnroe’s tune changed though for FIBG LTD. bank CEO Mark Kennedy with something to the effect that he arranged IMF loams and that the bank could become a project bank for the International Monetary Fund (IMF), and if not he knew of others who might assist the bank depending on what the bank had to offer besides its 10,000-carat hand-carved ruby statue depicting a boy on a water buffalo valued at $20-million some say the bank was originally capitalized with to procure its Grenada bank license.
What else did the bank have for assets? For starters, it had a joint venture contract agreement tying Indonesian legacy heritance certificates of deposit drawn on the UNION BANK OF SWITZERLAND (UBS) valued at $8.7-Billion dollars, which itemized precious bullion metals of gold and platinum in estate holdings of former Indonesia Premier Ir. Soekarno. MacEnroe claimed the bank had no title of it, however records prove the bank indeed held entitlement to receive 50% of trading profits for a period of two (2) years from the estate holder who signed over his Power Of Attorney along with an Irrevocable Deed Of Assignment, Safe-Keeping Receipt, and more.
The Sunday Tribune further reported MacEnroe refuting claims he had not divested FIBG LTD. bank of its assets nor was he arranging for a group of European investors to take over the bank.
In January 2006, evidence surfaced revealing that in 2000 those high-value asset instruments connected to FIBG LTD. bank were ‘heritance certificates of deposits’ and ‘heritance bank guarantees’ for billions in precious metal bullion linked to the Premier Ir. Soekarno Estate and within his friend Mr. A. G. Pringgodigdo estate holdings identified at the UNION BANK OF SWITZERLAND ( UBS AG ) placed under a Mandate With Power of Attorney [ UBS code: A.101.M.1 ] administered by a man named Muchamad Muchlan Buchori.
When Mr. Buchori died in 1984, his son named Muhamad Burhan ( Jakarta, Indonesia ) tried taking control of all Administration books, but his late-father Muchamad Muchlan Buchori had arranged that they ‘not’ pass to ‘his successor’ son Muhamad Burhan, but instead UBS saw an entity named PT GALAXY INDONESIA TRUST with two (2) men named through Premier Ir. Soekarno’s Last Will and Testament that would control the assets. One man was named Dr. Halim (Switzerland) and the other Dr. Edison Damanik (Jakarta, Indonesia), the latter of whom saw to distributing those UBS ‘heritance certificates’ to be handled under very specific instructions on their use. It was at that time when these high-value instrument certificates began surfacing around the World.
After Dr. Damanik passed-away, control over those valuable instrument holdings were passed onto several other parties ( names in files) by his wife in Maryland, USA.
It is believed all original Estate holdings were placed under the control of one ‘committee’ for family members named in a ‘collective leader board’. Further, that Estate funds appear to have not been touched by the appropriate Administrator for the past 35-years because that particular person has not yet claimed the position to do so.
In the meantime a lot of dangerous games appear to have been played regarding these heritance certificates as “worthless”, “fraudulent”, etc. by certain banks including that of ABN-AMRO and UBS alongside Mr. Burhan who ‘had’ access to e-Banking linked to UBS for the Estates. It is believed the heritance committee decided to block his PIN code access as of 2003 due to curious financial business activities.
Mr. Burhan is a close friend of Endang Darmawan, appearing to act as front-runner alongside Ir. Gunardjo, Paimo (aka) F. Danarasa, Halim Dharma Kusuma, M. Damanik, Kho Hian Sui, and Prebon Marshall Yamane.
A group believed to hold committee interest claims Mr. Burhan has been curiously protected by the U.S. National Security Agency ( NSA ) based on accounts tied to a man named Fredrick J. Robinson ( Wichita Falls, Texas, USA ), believed to be an oil consultant for 15-years working out of Bangkok, Thailand.
In early 2000, MacEnroe tried convincing FIBG LTD. bank Board of Director executives the assets they held were worthless, however behind the scenes and out of their view he consorted with FIBG LTD. bank CEO Mark Kennedy to convert one $8.7-billion asset into ‘another’ $8,700,000,000 billion ( USD ) valued asset he saw MacEnroe label as the 'takeover bank' “new asset” planned for re-injecting financial support but under his European client group, which made no promises of providing any returns to former FIBG LTD. bank depositors. [ NOTE: documenting these facts, is an extremely lengthy letter of ( 27-pages ) from the bank officer's letter to the new Acting Chief Executive Officer ( Lawrence A. Jones, a prominent London, UK barrister ) of the bank. ]
Former bank founder, Van Brink, had also drawn the FIBG LTD. bank controlling shareholder’s attention to the facts surrounding the mysterious MacEnroe brokering of the European group bank takeover deal.
Holding what appeared to be a key-position for the FIBG LTD. bank Board of Directors as whether to go with the FBI directed MacEnroe plan to steal the bank just as one $8,700,000,000 billion ( USD ) valued asset had already been done and crush all hope of depositors ever seeing their monies again or not was up to Cynthia Joy ( "Tai” ) Hastey who refused to give-in after what she was made aware of MacEnroe’s weeks of broken promises to the bank, which she viewed as an ‘economic threat’ forced by unreasonable demands on the bank with no guarantee for bank depositors, vendors, and staff just so the MacEnroe plan takeover group could also avail themselves of the other high-value assets already placed in trade from Brazil, trading profits that once returned would clear-up the bank.
Heastey's counter-offer letter was tendered to MacEnroe through FIBG LTD. bank CEO Mark Kennedy who now appears to claim he never passed that to MacEnroe at all. Instead, everyone involved saw Mark Kennedy resign within 24-hours on July 4, 2000.
On July 5th, 2000 the bank board entered negotiations with a London, UK barrister Lawrence A. Jones to take over the FIBG LTD. bank CEO position, which saw him formally accept that position before the Board on July 8th, 2000.
Although the MacEnroe deal was rejected, he never saw to returning the FIBG LTD. bank $8.7-billion dollar placed asset instruments from the Soekarno and Pringgodigdo Estates, which had originally been seen injected into FIBG LTD. bank by a man named Robert Earl Palm ( Canada ).
After Van Brink resigned as FIBG LTD. bank CEO on October 1, 1999 his successor CEO Mark Kennedy immediately met in Grenada with an international oil consultant named Michael K. Gabriel who had co-authored a global economic report with Van Brink earlier. After CEO Kennedy resigned and Lawrence Jones took over as CEO for a brief interim, Michael K. Gabriel became CEO of FIBG LTD. bank and immediately contacted former CEO Mark Kennedy in an effort to resurrect the MacEnroe takeover plan once again.
The 27-page letter written by former FIBG LTD. bank CEO Michael K. Gabriel to former FIBG LTD. bank CEO Lawrence A. Jones, CEO Gabriel describes the MacEnroe takeover plan in detail, mentioning the FIBG LTD. bank $8.7-billion Indonesian asset instruments from UNION BANK of SWITZERLAND (UBS), which MacEnroe saw to having reconstituted (re-built) in Jakarta, Indonesia with others (named in my files) in-conjunction with three ( 3 ) Swiss banks ( i.e. UNION BANK of SWITZERLAND ( UBS AG ), its client-bank CREDIT SUISSE, and the BANK FOR INTERNATIONAL SETTLEMENTS ( BIS ) so the asset instruments would be re-designed in such a way so as to ‘appear different’ and break the link having been previously involved with the FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK OF GRENADA LTD. ( FIBG ) joint venture contract agreements, which thereafter left FIBG unable to lay any legal claim that it was once in joint control over that Indonesia heritance asset instrument. Henceforth, the $8.7-billion asset having been transformed via FBI contractor MacEnroe 's directions, indistinguishable and thereby un-linked FIBG bank history showing such asset instrument tied-in to its past. These acts then could be ‘technically spoken-of’ as a “new asset”, which MacEnroe then led FIBG bank Board of Directors to believe via its mouthpiece CEO Mark Kennedy.
And ‘if’ such a European takeover group ever existed, which MacEnroe later claimed on August 8, 2004 that “there was no European consortium”, then MacEnroe’s fraudulent statements and those of his recruited de facto deputy agent CEO Kennedy were both in furtherance of criminal deception used against FIBG LTD. bank that served to disrupt and cause monetary depositor losses, according to what the U.S. government indictment states against former executives of FIBG LTD. bank – federal criminal defendants, now in Portland, Oregon – that “either the assets were fraudulent or never existed”, but behind-the-scenes - out of public purview - at the helm were U.S. government Non-Official Cover ( NOC ) foreign agents set-upon FIBG LTD. bank, according to the statement of MacEnroe, one of the agents involved in the scheme to put in-play a clever scheme to defraud and deprive FIBG LTD. bank of assets purposely designed via joint venture contract agreements to re-pay its bank depositors within the framework of its ‘scheduled high-yield interest’ as seen on its own “rate sheet”.
In short, not only did FIBG LTD. bank depositors lose their monies, but also FBI - MacEnroe and CIA - Palm led plans served to enhance the appearance of outrageous fraudulent behavior as what the U.S. government indictment appeared to reflect on Van Brink before he died in December 2005.
It’s only obvious, the former FIBG LTD. bank executives and their corporate counsel were conned by U.S. government Non-Official Cover (NOC) intelligence agents, one (1) of whom was placed ‘on loan’ to the Portland, Oregon field office of the F.B.I. according to his latter (08AUG04) statements revealing who called him to send him in on FIBG LTD. bank in Grenada.
Non-Official Cover (NOC) U.S. Government Agents
Rough 10-Step Trading Plan: How It Works
For decades, the U.S. government has used NOC agents where it wishes to deny its foreign actions as was revealed in headline stories in 2006 involving recently linked NOC agents to The White House. The use of NOC agents is nothing new, except to the general public.
U.S. government involvement is kept secret through a cleverly devised chain of attornies who act as ‘cut-outs’ between government intelligence plans and NOC agents sent-in to do government dirty work. Often times, NOC agents appear to be Teflon-coated, where they are excused of any wrong doing and allowed to get away with whatever monies they can scam out of targets during these highly secretive government operations.
In the case of FIBG bank, its network of other banks, and depositor victims the NOC agent government operation is quite simple yet deviously clever to ensure reduction, re-direction, and stemming-of Western country domestic-based capital flight from recognized and controlled ‘domestic registered banks’ and ‘domestic insurance company pension plans’ to stop unrecognized and uncontrolled foreign-based ‘independent off-shore banks’ and ‘independent off-shore insurance companies’. These latter groups, a threat perception recognized by Western intelligence agencies pose a ‘grave threat’ to ‘existing balances of economic national security’ when ‘independent offshore financial institutions network’, then-significant as an independent – yet networked - uncontrollable sources of money flow movements internationally in directions, contrary to what Central Banks and the U.S. Federal Reserve System (FED) would otherwise see controlled whereby this ‘wobble effect’ counter-balances the existing World banking ‘system’.
The ‘system’ or World banking system as it exists today, has its basis conceived on ‘fractional reserve banking’ and its seemingly never-ending expansion of fiat paper currency money supply it uses to float loans, trade, etc. with history dating back to 1928 up through present day proving Western intelligence agencies have protected that well-entrenched heritance / traditional World bank system’ working concept anywhere an independent international banking system pops-up a commodity-based ( e.g. independent banks planning to tie themselves to precious metals, such as a network of gold based banks ) utilizing ‘inverse leverage’ as the anti-thesis of the traditional ‘fractional reserve’ and ‘fiat currencies’ for float. Western intelligence protection is the ‘action arm’ of Foreign Policy directive edicts seen from Executive Branch Level governments ( i.e. Presidents, Prime Ministers, Premiers, Kings, Queens, and other potentates ).
Texas Two Step
The U.S. government foreign policy intelligence plan became operationalized upon Non-Official Cover ( NOC ) foreign agents being sent-in to initially ‘inject evidence’ of high-value asset instruments and later ‘withdraw evidence’ tied to FIBG bank and its network of IBC and satellite constellation of sub-banks pooling depositor monies lost across that spectrum into black-hole trading programs claimed by both NOC agents. The plan was nicknamed, “Texas Two Step”.
High-Value Asset Instrument Distribution
In 1984, specific high-value asset instruments were sent by Southeast Asia and South Pacific interests to Europe and from there to India where they were turned around and sent to the Far East.
In 1986, these same high-value asset instruments appeared from Europe in the Middle East.
Crime History Of High-Value Asset Instruments
In July 1991, these same high-value asset instruments along with ‘others’ ( e.g. 88 certificates from Japan alone ), other foreign and domestic country transaction obligations, to include one (1) $278-Billion dollar certificate, $45-Billion dollar certificate, etc., etc. ) were confiscated in Texas (USA). See, e.g. U.S. District Court (Austin, Texas) USA vs. Edison Damanik, CASE NO.: A-91-200-M and CASE NO.: A-91-CR-00107 (aka) 1:91-CR-107; and, U.S. District Court ( Dallas, Texas ) USA vs. Tommy Lee Buckley, Lewis Wilborn Driver ( Giddings, Texas ), et al.
On April 1, 1992 AUSA Price requested - on behalf of the U.S. government - all federal criminal charges ‘dismissed’ against Dr. Edison Damanik ( Indonesia ) eleven ( 11 ) days after a mysterious lawyer named Barry E. Burke ( Chicago, Illinois ) came out of retirement, was added as co-counsel to Stephen M. Orr, Esq. in the defense of Dr. Damanik defense case.
With more than five ( 5 ) federal felony arrests - made by U.S. Secret Service agents in at least two (2) Texas cities ( Dallas and Austin, Texas ) - the high-value asset instruments case was dismissed by the U.S. government after 9-months. Who was that mystery lawyer from Chicago, Illinois who - without so much as ever having made one (1) pleading - saw this huge federal criminal case dismissed on a Motion by the U.S. government out of the clear blue sky?
Just after the Damanik federal case was dismissed in 1992, the former Soviet Union KGB identified a man named Robert Earl Palm as a U.S. government Non-Official Cover ( NOC ) foreign agent involved in a currency exchange fraud where he was seen putting ‘high-value asset instruments’ into play.
The KGB provided official Russia, Ukraine, Poland, Finland, and US documents faxed by Robert Palm, now available on the internet, linking him to a $15,000,000,000 billion ( USD ) trading program named “YOKAMURA” in a case involving COLE-TAYLOR BANK ( Chicago, Illinois ), WINDOW TRADING LTD., CARTESA FINANCE ( Switzerland, Liechtenstein, and in Curitiba, Brazil ), and others involved.
Today, the Russian government claims Robert Palm spurred into action Russia’s capital flight problem over a 5-year period that saw to removing nearly $1,000,000,000,000 trillion - in USD value terms - where later upon Russian request, the U.S. government called-in a firm named KROLL ASSOCIATES to assist the Russian government in tracking down ‘where their money went’. KROLL was never able to locate or recovery any of Russia’s missing Trillion dollars. According to The Wall Street Journal ( July 23, 1993 ) report, Robert Earl Palm claimed in 1991 that he was the representative of UNITED NATIONAL REPUBLIC BANK (UNRB) of Russia holding assets of $1,895,000,000,000 trillion dollars in ( USD ) value. The Russia government indicated their records showed no bank ‘by that name’ registered ‘in Russia’ at ‘that time’.
In 1994, 2-years after the Dr. Edison Damanik case saw his high-value asset instruments ‘checked out of’ the Austin, Texas U.S. District Court evidence safe - based on a special request by AUSA Price on behalf of the U.S. government, some of them re-appeared ‘again’ in a Sydney, Australia federal criminal case naming Anthony Hamod with $78,000,000,000 billion + in ( USD ) high-value asset instruments. As in the Damanik case, Anthony Hamod was arrested and federal criminal charges against him dismissed months later. But, the Australian federal court evidence points to Anthony Hamod claiming he met with Dr. Edison Damanik in Switzerland and that the instruments came from a Damanik controlled Indonesia company named PT GALAXY INDONESIA. The Australian federal court ordered that those high-value asset instruments be released back to Anthony Hamod in 1996, however the record is unclear as to whether Hamod ever received those instruments over Australian federal law enforcement objections.
In 1998, 2-years after the Anthony Hamod case in Australia, Robert Earl Palm shows up with his high-value asset instruments again, but this time in Canada where they were sent down to the Caribbean for injection into the First International Bank of Grenada Ltd. ( FIBG ) bank asset structure through joint venture contract agreements with international business companies, which included SHERWOOD INVESTMENTS LIMITED ( Bahamas ) tied to Robert Earl Palm.
In an interview with FIBG bank founder and first CEO Van A. Brink, he met Robert Earl Palm in-person and remained with him for several days in Victoria, British Columbia, Canada where Bob Palm tried schooling Van Brink on how those high-value asset instruments might be used offshore to obtain onshore investor monies worldwide.
Brink said, “Bob Palm’s assistant [ Jason Matthew Walsh (aka) Matt Walsh ] wheeled a small file cabinet over to Palm who removed a ‘few’ billion dollars worth of bank financial instrument certificates and threw them in my lap saying, ‘If the bank does well with these, I’ve $2,000,000,000,000 trillion ( USD ) more right here’.” Interestingly, the June 23, 1993 Wall Street Journal newspaper article read, "he [ Robert Palm ] was the representative of UNITED NATIONAL REPUBLIC BANK (UNRB) of Russia holding assets of $1,895,000,000,000 trillion dollars in ( USD ) value."
How The Odds Work: Two-Steps to 10-Steps
While the Texas Two Step may be all that’s seen from Fanx I in Maryland, USA, NOC agent field operations identify at least ten ( 10 ) stages for their operation to have any success at all.
A list of basics, understood to work with most small independent offshore banks, see:
Convincing Target Banks
One ( 1 ): send-in the first (1st) Non-Official Cover (NOC) foreign agent who sees to injecting – without signing anything dealing with - high-value asset instruments that read (on the face of the instruments) in (USD) values worth billions ‘each’. Announce to the small independent offshore bank executives that the instruments can be verified by bank corporate counsel using due diligence. That after the bank is satisfied, placement of those asset instruments into special / secret trading programs will net the banks incredibly high rates of return to the tune of hundreds if not thousands of percentage points in returned trading profits for them. Claim the assets as well as trading programs are known only to government central banks or incredibly huge organizations kept secret for decades so typical retail and commercial banks never really know how much profit in the billions are actually being made on pooling depositor’s monies in such trading programs where the minimum entrant fees start at $100-million and go up. Show support documentation that tends to lend credence demonstrating asset instrument legitimacy where even heads of state appear signed verifying such as true.
IBC Account Conduits
Two ( 2 ): the NOC agent arranges with the banks to receive depositor’s millions for ‘broker transaction fees’ by suggesting to banks they “network” together, and for the bank to successfully participate it should consider linking-up with other independent offshore banks by banding together as a network of satellite banks to invest all depositor account monies for these assets to be used in high-yield trading programs. By the banks tying themselves to these asset instruments in joint venture contract agreements with trade representatives of international business companies (IBCs) the bank will automatically be set up to receive its trading profits in a variety of ways, which is basically the foundation each bank established for themselves to be conduits of money being passed through each other. All the banks did was see money compiled from depositor monies for the ‘trading broker (NOC agent) transaction fees’ and the ‘trading program entrant fees’ paid so the banks could begin participation in the planned receipt of what the NOC agent had convinced them to expect, which was high-yield trading profits. Depositor monies were sent into bank-client’s international business company (IBC) accounts, and from there, through a series of the trading broker’s (NOC agent’s) international business company numbered accounts. Meanwhile these targeted banks, now all linked together through bank wire money transfers, were convinced the trading process had begun so, they could see depositors ‘scheduled high-yield interest rates of return based on deposit size’ paid on-time. The banks counted their trading program profit chickens before the asset instrument egg placements into these ‘trading programs saw to hatching profits by the banks funding additional projects in order to scoop-up yet other high-value assets supplied by the NOC agent (trading broker) for placement into yet other high-yield trading programs. The trading program congame on the banks was then in full swing, as were depositor monies flying in the wings based on NOC agent commercial bank paper trading program profit promises to the banks sending money in and out of other banks to accomplish their goals too.
Strategic Delays: High-Value Trading Program Deals Fall Through
Three ( 3 ): as trading program interval times come and go, according to NOC agent ( trading broker ) claims, banks are provided what appear to be plausible excuses as to why the trading program profit returns to the banks are taking longer as the most common excuse of all is that the trading profits are sent into escrow accounts handled between big banks and lawyers before disbursements can be legitimately realized by the trading broker’s (NOC agent’s) client banks awaiting pay-outs where the infamous word “soon” is often relayed all the way down the line in furtherance of the NOC agent fraud against the bank, which never appears seen by bank customer’s, just what ‘they’ hear coming from the banks where their monies were deposited. If the bank tires of excuses and demands their monies back, simply offer them additional asset instruments in the millions as an incentive to just hang-on a while longer until the trading profits clear escrow accounts in a month or so.
News Tips Worry Bank Deals
Four ( 4 ): simply place a rumor in the financial business world that specific bank(s) are experiencing difficulties returning interest to depositors, which will see the targeted bank(s) desperately scrambling to answer attorney letters as the beginning stages of lawsuits from depositors. In that wake, slip the first (1st) NOC agent out of the picture entirely, making him unavailable ( overseas on business but returning “soon”) to return calls to the bank(s).
Changing Of The Guards ( NOC Pea & Shell Game )
Five ( 5 ): send-in the second ( 2nd ) NOC agent as a highly-respected trading and/or securities consultant recommended by one of the inside bank consultants, recruited earlier to perform ‘authorized signatory functions’ over the high-value asset instruments structured within joint-venture contract agreements signed by the bank with other IBCs. Offer the bank a potential bailout from an unidentified cash-cow group by stating that it is a secret consortium of European businessmen interested in buying-up independent banks with the help of the trading consultant (NOC agent). Freely consult with the primary bank (for a network of sub-banks) chief executive officer that the bank problems could be why it isn’t receiving trading profits as promised. Caution the executive that they must act fast because if the high-value asset instruments are counterfeit, fraudulent, or in any way worthless by means of perhaps yet an unknown secret secondary assignment the bank may have known nothing about earlier, that the chief executive officer may end-up taking the fall and going to prison for a very long time unless something isn’t done right away to counter it to save the bank(s). Again, freely offer to discreetly check the legitimacy of ‘all high-value instrument documentation’ only to be reviewed by very secret experts in Europe who happen to owe this NOC agent consultant special favors he can call-in.
Six ( 6 ): the bank tiring of NOC agent #1 not returning their calls, adverse news publicity, and the first lawsuit filed by a depositor over lost monies, will instantly become a prime target of U.S. government investigative bodies. All NOC agent #2 does is makes his or her self, available to assist the government in any way they possible, meanwhile all the bank(s) asset instruments are in the possession of NOC agent #2.
Cultivating Bank Mules
Seven ( 7 ): NOC agent #2 calls the bank executive to Europe claiming what he discovered cannot be discussed over the phone. Once the bank officer is in Europe at the designated hotel meeting place, the trading consultant ( NOC agent #2 ) informs the bank executive that ‘he’ ( the ‘bank executive’ ) is in big trouble with the U.S. government and that if he does not fully cooperate with him he’ll eventually be charged with international fraud and money-laundering and then nothing can be done for him or the bank. Once the bank executive is convinced that it’s either the consultant’s (NOC agent’s) way or no way he’ll have been primed and ready for the next stage.
Convince the bank executive that only one (1), possibly two (2) groups of the bank high-value asset instruments can possibly be worked, but only with his dedicated cooperation to see the bank saved as well as himself but that only he (the executive) can guarantee his own success by the level of cooperation he’s willing to extend. Once the bank executive agrees then NOC agent #2 convinces him to sign a ‘personal confidentiality agreement’ with the consultant, which also makes him a part of the secret European consortium answerable to prosecution should he ever decide to breech such a contract in the future.
With the lead bank executive’s cooperation contacting the authorized signatory on behalf of the bank holding the specific high-value asset instruments that are designated by NOC agent #2 as being “workable” the bank executive and NOC agent #2 ( consultant ) go forward to see to the removal and reconstitution of what had been previously tied to the bank(s) as high-value asset instrument commercial bank paper(s).
Convincing Several Holders Of The Same Asset
Eight ( 8 ): NOC agent #2 contacts the true holder of the high-value asset instruments and calls a meeting with the actual asset holders, explaining that they are about to lose their entire assets behind the unscrupulous financial business deeds of an independent offshore bank currently seen in news reports, under federal investigation, and about to be seized by the tiny government in which it is currently situated. Indicate that having been concerned by what was about to unfold, steps were taken to protect their assets, and that a plan is available to them should they care to act quickly before they lose everything. That the plan can only be successful through their full cooperation and that all NOC agent #2 (consultant) wishes from his work is his usual and customary fee of one percent (1%) on the amount involved where portions of that fee may be spread out over a schedule of cash, monetary instruments, and re-investment into a Trust benefiting all interested parties over a lengthy period of time. That through a careful process of transforming previously held asset instruments with the holding bank and its client bank through another Estate Fund Trust controlled by their own collective Board members that such would alleviate unnecessary publicity and the loss of their assets already in-place at the current time. And, finally that none of their banks need be concerned that it is only a collective Board decision to re-assign assets while allowing existing banks to maintain current governance over the same assets with minimal loss.
Bank in Liechtenstein Trust ( BIL ) fund accounts for NOC agent #2 and participant Trustee and legal guardians would see immediate benefits to establish all that necessary arrangements for receipt of such a transaction entrusted to them by NOC agent #2.
CIA NOC Agents On-Loan To FBI: Heavy Tippers
Nine ( 9 ): NOC agent #2 notifies his handler (Washington DC metroplex area) that any and/or all traces of the high-value asset instruments have been successfully shielded from view and that the FBI may now proceed with new information as to who specifically are not to become targets of a federal investigation and should be called as cooperative witnesses to testify against who NOC agent #2 identifies as criminal co-conspirators causing depositor’s monies lost based on fraudulent claims to high-value asset instruments bank executives have no proof ever existed, and for the bank executives seeing to the establishment of IBC bank money transfer accounts as nothing more than money-laundering devices.
NOC Agents
1.) Robert Earl Palm, under U.S. government sanction for his planned cooperation, saw to injecting the vast majority of all high-value asset instruments into FIBG LTD. bank via joint venture agreement contracts involving international business companies ( IBC ) he controlled - but not necessarily named on - with his vociferous claim to Van A. Brink and others, these assets would be placed into trading programs netting extremely high-yield interest trading profits back to FIBG LTD. bank, in-exchange for which he saw receipt of millions of FIBG LTD. bank and it’s network of sub-banks depositor’s monies going into numbered accounts. Everyone wanted to place money in the banks offering high-yield returns in Robert Earl Palm’s claimed trading program profit pay-offs to these banks; and,
2.) Gabriel Francis MacEnroe, under U.S. government sanction for his planned cooperation, threatened FIBG LTD. bank former CEO Mark Kennedy ( Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada ) to cooperate in seeing FIBG LTD. bank high-value asset instruments separated from their past with assistance of authorized signatory William Randolph (“Bill”) Davis ( Chino Hills, California, USA ) and his associate Lewis ( “Louis”) Trotta ( San Francisco, California ) whom met with Alan Eigher in Jakarta, Indonesia for said Indonesian high-value asset instruments conversion process to begin.
The MacEnroe-FBI extortion against FIBG LTD. bank CEO Mark Kennedy worked, as did the transformation, details of which are too lengthy to describe, but enabled MacEnroe to collect his usual and customary one-percent (1%) commission fees by arranging it all.
FIBG LTD. bank Board of Directors were told a so-called “new asset” seen by MacEnroe within his European takeover group was willing to act in an effort to shore-up their bank, however MacEnroe had already instructed FIBG LTD. bank CEO Kennedy to divest itself of that $8.7-billion high-value asset instrument earlier without other members of the Bank Board of Directors knowledge. In-fact, the “new asset” was basically derived from the $8.7-billion FIBG LTD. bank high-value asset instrument linked to Indonesian heritance Estates tied by their Holder’s authorized signatory holding Power Of Attorney at act as was demonstrated in a Joint Venture contract agreement between international business companies (IBCs) GENESIS HOLDINGS CORP. (Grenada) and its director Richard W. Downes who was also Chairman of the Board of Directors for FIBG LTD. bank, SHERWOOD INVESTMENTS (BAHAMAS) LTD. directed by Robert Earl Palm, BURL HOWARD SECURITIES CORP. directed by Robert Earl Palm, et al. and its CEO Alexander Gilbert Baraona, and FIRST INTERNATIONAL BANK OF GRENADA LIMITED bank.
After FIBG LTD. bank first CEO Brink resigned on October 1, 1999 and his successor CEO Kennedy resigned on July 4, 2000 and after his successor Acting CEO Lawrence A. Jones stepped aside, FIBG LTD. bank was seen with CEO Michael K. Gabriel contacted former CEO Kennedy who briefed him on what had transpired with the MacEnroe deal. CEO Gabriel then tried to salvage the MacEnroe deal when he wrote a 27-page letter to Lawrence A. Jones outlining, amongst other things, the MacEnroe deal once again, but on August 11, 2000 the Grenada government stepped-in and took control of FIBG LTD. bank, and went on to appoint two (3) Grenada government assigned Statutory Interim Administrators (Garvey Louison and Errol Thomas) in succession, and then appointed a Liquidator named Marcus A. Wide of PriceWaterhouseCoopers (Nova Scotia, Canada).
The Liquidator presented three ( 3 ) Statutory Interim Reports where the last report (July 2003) indicated no evidence existed that FIBG LTD. bank ever held any high-value asset instruments.
In January 2004, three ( 3 ) FIBG bank executives Robert John Skirving, Laurent E. Barnabe, and Rita Brunges Regale were arrested by FBI agents on charges of fraud and money laundering stemming from a federal indictment alleging the bank made fraudulent claims to having had high-value asset instruments where no evidence was found to exist.
On May 28, 2004 two ( 2 ) more FIBG LTD. bank executives, whom included Van A. Brink, were also arrested by the FBI agents on charges of fraud and money laundering stemming from a federal indictment alleging the bank made fraudulent claims to having had high-value asset instruments where no evidence was found to exist.
On December 10, 2005 FIBG LTD. bank founder and first CEO Van A. Brink died prior to the group trial set for 2007.
====
1990 - 2006
Several U.S. federal ‘criminal’ and ‘civil’ cases (shown below) name Gabriel Francis MacEnroe who claims he can arrange IMF loans and bail out troubled banks by seeing them turned into IMF project banks - one of several cons he uses to gain his usual and customary fees of approximately one percent (1%) for arranging such transactions. Based on others who highly recommend him, his fees are consistently paid up-front. Even more consistently though, are hundreds of millions lost by independent investors after MacEnroe leaves the stage.
One particular case ( further below ) details activities from 1990 - 1992 where the FBI coordinated different roles for its contractors, named:
Mercedes Travis, Esq. ( ex-wife of, Robert Chiari );
Gabriel Francis MacEnroe; and,
William P. Caraluzzi, Esq.
Worked in-concert, this case saw Ms. Travis’ law client John J. Voigt, et al. charged with federal criminal fraud, money-laundering, tax evasion, and criminal forfeiture after client’s investment monies disappeared as Mr. MacEnroe ( at an office in Stamford, Connecticut ) saw them earmarked for META TRADING AND FINANCIAL INTERNATIONAL ( MTFI ) placement into a trading program claimed tied to The Holy Roman Catholic Church through the EURO-AMERICAN MONEY FUND TRUST ( EAMFT ), headquartered in Europe with representative offices in the U.S. The scheme saw the name of the KNIGHTS OF MALTA tossed-about in claims they were participating too.
Over 2-1/2 years on this case alone MacEnroe and others dealing with EAMFT saw loan applicants and investor’s lose approximately $18,500,000 million (USD) based on "self-liquidating" loans designed to repay what were supposedly tied to Master Collateral Commitments (MCC) involving high-value asset instruments as commercial bank paper for entry into ‘trading programs’ to net high-yield interest after supposedly poling funds of their investors.
Reference
caselaw.findlaw.com/us-3rd-circuit/1210029.html
FBI contractor Gabriel MacEnroe ( as above ) has seen many-many U.S. criminal and civil cases involving monetary loss from fraud surrounding his and his named companies financial business deals, named in:
- - - -
1992 – (CIVIL) Dallas, Texas [CASE NO.: 3:92-CV-00033 or 3:92-CV-00331, naming: “GF MacEnroe” and “Abbey Finance & Mortgage Company Limited” (United Kingdom), William P Caraluzzi, Ralph A. Anderskow, et al.; $367,500.00 Fraud];
- -
1993 – ( CRIMINAL ) Trenton, New Jersey [CASE NO.: 3:93-CR-00300-0, naming: Gabriel MacEnroe, William P. Caraluzzi, Ralph A. Anderskow, Mercedes Travis, Solis Alevy, Donald Anchors, et al.; $18,500,000.00 money-maundering and fraud. See, e.g. [ vls.law.vill.edu/locator/3d/July1996/96a1344p.txt ]
- -
1998 – ( CIVIL ) Newark, New Jersey [ BANKRUPTCY CASE NO.: 98-44940, naming: “Commercial Capital Establishment ( Liechtenstein )”, “CCE”, Willy Farah, et al.; In RE: 1995 $60,000,000.00 investment fraud ];
- -
1998 – ( CIVIL ) New York, New York [NASD ( National Association of Securities Dealers ) CASE DATE: 01SEP98, In RE: Bear Stearns & Co. Inc. vs. “Gabriel MacEnroe”, “Commercial Capital Establishment”, “CCE”, et al.];
- -
1999 – ( CIVIL ) Newark, New Jersey [ BANKRUPTCY ADVERSARY CASE NO.: 99-3010, naming: “Commercial Capital Establishment”, “CCE”, Willy Farah, et al. ( Total Claims: $46,698,723.30 ) ];
- -
1999 – ( CRIMINAL ) Ft. Lauderdale, Florida [ CASE NO.: 8:00-CR-00027, USA v. Womack, et al.; naming: “Gabriel MacEnroe”, et al.; $56,000,000.00 money-laundering and fraud ];
- -
1999 - (Criminal) Minneapolis, Minnesota [ United States of America v. Howard Eugene Liner, CR NO.: 04-2497, naming Gabriel MacEnroe, Christopher Patrick Heron, Larry Ewers, et al.]
Reference
openjurist.org/435/f3d/920/united-states-v-liner
openjurist.org/419/f3d/1
- -
2000 – ( CIVIL ) Newark, New Jersey [ CASE NO.: 2:00-CV-00952, Raymond Keith Richards v. PNC Bank N.A.; naming: “Gabriel MacEnroe” and “Commercial Capital Establishment” ( Vaduz, Liechtenstein and St. Gallen, Switzerland ), et al.; $60,000,000.00 Diversity Fraud, See, e.g. www.njusao.org/files/fa0420_r.htm ];
- -
2000 – ( CRIMINAL ) Greenville, South Carolina [ CASE No.: 8:00-CR-00697, naming: “Gabriel MacEnroe”, Joseph R. Silvestri, David Alan Morgenstern, Vernon W. Shiflett, et al.; Charges: conspiracy to defraud the government and aiding and abetting wire fraud $52,000,000.00 ]; Gabriel Francis MacEnroe status ( June 20, 2003 ) Failure To Appear, Warrant issued, foreign-based U.S. federal fugitive, See e.g. [ www.frauddigest.com/indictments/USA_v_MacEnroe_et_al_COMPLAINT.pdf and www.savannahnow.com/stories/111002/LOCPonziScheme.shtml ];
- -
2001 – ( CIVIL ) San Diego, California [ CASE NO.: 8:01-CV-01085, naming “Gabriel MacEnroe”, Ralph King, David Alan Morgenstern, Virgil Womack, Byron Z. Moldo, Robbie Stevens, Dante Orgolini, Peter A. Davidson, Scott J. Rein Esq., Patrick J. Evans Esq., Thomas R. Sestanovich Esq., Rein Evans & Sestanovich LLP, (fka) Dressler Rein Evans & Sestanovich LLP, law partnership and successor to Dressler, Rein, Evans & Sestanovich LLP; Securities Exchange Act ];
- -
2002 – ( CRIMINAL ) New Orleans, Louisiana [ CASE NO.: (UNDER SEAL), naming: “Gabriel MacEnroe”, et al.; In RE: San Diego, California CASE NO.: 8:01-CV-01085 ( above ) ];
- -
2002 – ( CRIMINAL ) Albuquerque, New Mexico [ CASE: USA vs. Powell Onen P’Ojwong ( West Nile, Uganda and London, UK ), Ian Burns ( London, UK and Barcelona, Spain ), “Gabriel MacEnroe” (St. Gallen, Switzerland), Ralph King, et al.; See, e.g. U.S. Attorney John Kelly ( In RE: $4-million investment trading program, City Of Clovis New Mexico ( City Manager, Terri McCully ), and LOMORO SECURITIES account at CITIBANK Espana ( Spain ); Money-Laundering and Wire Fraud ]; and,
- -
2003 – ( CIVIL ) Dallas, Texas [ CASE NO.: 3:03-CV-01016, naming: “Gabriel MacEnroe” and “Commercial Capital Establishment”, et al. - Judgment: $2,282,287.50 Failure To Pay balance of $10,000,000.00 awarded by NASD ( National Association of Securities Dealers ) to BEAR STEARNS & CO. INC.; CASE ( 01SEP98 ) ]
- - - -
Interested parties who encounter Gabriel MacEnroe were encouraged to contact:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE – Criminal Division
10th and Constitution Avenue North West
Washington, DC 20530
USA
TEL: (202) 616-9871
CONTACT: Mr. James Pavlock
- - - -
Prior to Gabriel MacEnroe having occupied an office in Stamford, Connecticut during the early-1990s, he occupied another office in Beverly Hills, California during the late 1980s that was seen shut down in the wake of missing investor client monies after a complaint spurred an investigation by the U.S. Office Of Thrift Supervision.
MacEnroe is man with at least three ( 3 ) passport citizenships who is said to be a prolific writer and record keeper of information on almost everything discussed with him by anyone, which may speak loudly as to why the F.B.I. has used him internationally and in the United States as their financial business informant on more than just one (1) occasion. MacEnroe’s rise to infamy through nefarious financial business activities has built the small fortune he’s been able to amass during 15-years of dedicated but most curious service to governments around the World.
He is what some consider a Non-Official Cover ( NOC ) government intelligence foreign agent seen claiming to others that he can help provide International Monetary Fund ( IMF ) loans to banks, can arrange private placement investments for involvement in high-yield trading programs, provide credit enhancements, etc., etc.
In October 2000, MacEnroe saw a U.S. federal criminal indictment ( see copy of indictment further below ) against him officially report his claims that he operates with the following U.S. government agencies, to wit:
U.S. Treasury Department;
Federal Bureau of Investigation ( F.B.I. );
Central Intelligence Agency ( C.I.A. );
National Security Agency ( N.S.A. ); and,
Federal Reserve Board ( FED ).
Gabreil Francis MacEnroe's criminal indictment also revealed his father ( a London, UK barrister assigned as Trustee for the now-late John Paul Getty Jr. II ) had been a collector of information for the F.B.I. as well.
EAMFT represented it had large sums of money available for private investment lending and this was one means by which The Holy Roman Catholic Church ( Vatican ) made considerable money from the interest earned on loans for funding some of its operations.
MacEnroe had a number of proposed loans at the time for various projects of people who had been presented to him seeking loans. The people put up ‘advanced fees’ to the EAMFT group, and after due diligence completion, loan documents were entered into. No projects were funded by EAMFT because the group who said it represented EAMFT ran off with the money instead, which was never recovered.
MacEnroe’s 1991 business partner Ralph A. Anderskow and John J. Voigt were arrested, convicted, sentenced to federal prison.
Gabriel F. MacEnroe, William P. Caraluzzi, and Mercedes Travis walked away free.
The $18,500,000.00 was never recovered.
Ralph A. Anderskow was released from federal prison in 2002.
John J. Voigt has his federal prison release set for 2007.
The F.B.I. Atlantic City, New Jersey field office saw FBI Special Agent Alvin Powell investigate the case and handle its contractors, assets and informants.
Powell retired on what was believed to be a disability pension due to a back injury.
Alvin Powell
414 Tryon Avenue [ street name, may be: “Tyron” ]
Englewood, New Jersey 07631
USA
TEL: (201) 816 - 8290
Highlights ( below ) of the EURO-AMERICAN MONEY FUND TRUST ( EAMFT ) and META TRADING AND FINANCIAL INTERNATIONAL ( MTFI ) federal investigation case from the eyes of the federal Court:
Criminal Docket No.: 3:93-CR-300-0
Original Case No.: 93-CR-00300-ALL
Revised Case No.: 93-CR-00300-GEB
Case Filed: 06/14/93
Case Assigned to: Judge Garrett E. Brown, Jr.
U.S. District Court
District of New Jersey (Trenton, New Jersey)
USA v. VOIGT, et al.
John J. Voigt (1), defendant
Ralph A. Anderskow (2), defendant
Mercedes Travis (3), defendant
Solis Alevy (aka) Skip Alevy (5), defendant
Donald Anchors (4), defendant
. . . [EDITED-OUT FOR BREVITY] . . .
- - - -
Appeal:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT
______________
No. 95-5093
______________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
RALPH A. ANDERSKOW, Appellant
______________
No. 95-5094
______________
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
v.
DONALD ANCHORS, Appellant
On Appeal from the United States District Court
for the District of New Jersey
(D.C. Criminal Nos. 93-cr-00300-02 & 93-cr-00300-03)
_______________
Argued January 25, 1996
Before: COWEN and SAROKIN, Circuit Judges, and POLLAK, District Judge
(Filed July 9, l996)
_______________
Richard F. X. Regan, Esq. (ARGUED)
Hayden, Perle and Silber
1500 Harbor Boulevard
Weehawken, New Jersey 07087
COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT ANDERSKOW
- - - -
Michael M. Mustokoff, Esq. (ARGUED)
Teresa N, Cavenagh, Esq.
Judith E. Baylinson, Esq.
Duane, Morris & Heckscher
One Liberty Place
Philadelphia, PA 19103
COUNSEL FOR APPELLANT ANCHORS
- - - -
Allan Tananbaum (ARGUED)
Faith Hochberg
United States Attorney
970 Broad Street
Newark, New Jersey 07102
COUNSEL FOR APPELLEE
_______________
OPINION OF THE COURT
_______________
COWEN, Circuit Judge.
Ralph Anderskow and Donald Anchors appeal from judgments of conviction and sentence entered by the District Court for the District of New Jersey. The convictions arise out of their participation, along with several other co-conspirators, in the Euro-American Money Fund Trust (the "Trust"), an entity that was used to perpetrate a pernicious advance-fee scheme. Over a 3-year period, the Trust bilked unsuspecting loan applicants and investors out of over $18-million dollars. Both defendants raise evidentiary and legal sufficiency challenges. We will affirm the judgments of conviction.
I.
John Voigt was the mastermind of a scheme to obtain fees from loan applicants and potential investors for nonexistent loans and investments. At the heart of this scheme was the Trust. Voigt fabricated a fictitious genealogy for the Trust, claiming that it was a long-established European financial institution affiliated with the Catholic Church and the Knights of Malta, and that it had access to billions of dollars. For two and one-half years brokers for the Trust would recount this false genealogy to unsuspecting loan applicants and investors, who would part with substantial fees in return for "self-liquidating" loans (loans that repaid themselves) and "Master Collateral Commitments" ("MCCs"), allegedly a special form of commercial paper available only to banks.
Voigt benefited from the cooperation of several co-conspirators, including Anderskow, a partner at a Chicago law firm who also was a certified public accountant. He was hired as the Trust's lawyer in the Chicago area, and his credentials helped provide the Trust with an appearance of legitimacy, which facilitated its attempts to lure loan applicants and potential investors. Anderskow's primary responsibility was providing guarantees to borrowers on behalf of the Trust and maintaining a client escrow account into which advance fees were deposited. Anderskow would immediately distribute fees that had been deposited into his escrow account according to Voigt's instructions, which violated the terms of contracts entered into with the loan applicants and investors. For his role in the Trust Anderskow received $995,000 in compensation.
In January of 1991 appellant Anchors was hired for the position of "loan oversight officer." Somewhat akin to a customer relations manager, Anchors was primarily responsible for responding to questions and complaints from customers of the Trust. Over time, Anchors devoted much of his time to placating loan applicants who had paid advance fees and were calling with increasing frequency to inquire as to the status of their loans. Anchors eventually responded to several hundred calls each month, assuring disgruntled borrowers that their loans were about to be funded. Eventually, Anchors began to tell some applicants that other loans had been funded, which he knew was untrue. Anchors received $325,000 for his participation in the Trust.
In June of 1993, a federal grand jury issued a 26-count indictment against Anderskow, Anchors, and their 3 co-conspirators - Voigt, Mercedes Travis, and Solis Alevy.
Alevy entered a plea of guilty, and became a government witness.
Subsequently, the grand jury issued a 28-count superseding indictment against the remaining 4 defendants, charging Anderskow and Anchors with conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud, and money laundering, and bringing criminal money laundering forfeiture allegations against them.
After a 3-month trial, a jury convicted Anderskow on all charges except 2 counts of wire fraud.
Anchors was convicted of conspiracy and 7 counts of wire fraud, but was acquitted of 7 other counts of wire fraud and 2 counts of money laundering.
Anderskow and Anchors were sentenced, respectively, to terms of imprisonment of 78 and 32-months.
This appeal followed.
. . . [EDITED-OUT FOR BREVITY] . . .