Post by Sapphire Capital on Aug 1, 2008 3:03:27 GMT 4
'Law and Finance' Revisited
Holger Spamann
Harvard University - Harvard Law School
February 2008
Harvard Law School John M. Olin Center Discussion Paper No. 12
Abstract:
The Antidirector Rights Index from La Porta et al.'s Law and Finance (1998) has been used as a measure of shareholder protection in almost 100 published studies. With articles by legal scholars questioning the accuracy of index values for several countries, I undertake a systematic study to verify these values for 46 countries with the help of local lawyers. My emphasis is on accuracy of the data; I do not change the original variable definitions. The study leads to a substantial revision: 33 of the 46 observations need to be corrected, and the correlation of corrected and original values is only .53. With accurate values, the well-known results of La Porta et al. (1997, 1998) no longer hold: accurate index values are neither distributed with significant differences between Common and Civil Law countries nor correlated with stock market size and ownership dispersion. All of the many results derived with the index will have to be revisited.
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID1095526_code402488.pdf?abstractid=1095526&mirid=3
Holger Spamann
Harvard University - Harvard Law School
February 2008
Harvard Law School John M. Olin Center Discussion Paper No. 12
Abstract:
The Antidirector Rights Index from La Porta et al.'s Law and Finance (1998) has been used as a measure of shareholder protection in almost 100 published studies. With articles by legal scholars questioning the accuracy of index values for several countries, I undertake a systematic study to verify these values for 46 countries with the help of local lawyers. My emphasis is on accuracy of the data; I do not change the original variable definitions. The study leads to a substantial revision: 33 of the 46 observations need to be corrected, and the correlation of corrected and original values is only .53. With accurate values, the well-known results of La Porta et al. (1997, 1998) no longer hold: accurate index values are neither distributed with significant differences between Common and Civil Law countries nor correlated with stock market size and ownership dispersion. All of the many results derived with the index will have to be revisited.
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/Delivery.cfm/SSRN_ID1095526_code402488.pdf?abstractid=1095526&mirid=3