Post by Sapphire Capital on Aug 2, 2008 0:01:01 GMT 4
The Elusive Aim of Universal Suffrage: Constitutional Developments in Hong Kong
Lorenz Langer
affiliation not provided to SSRN
International Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 5, Issue 3, pp. 419-452, 2007
Abstract:
For most of its one hundred and fifty years, British rule over Hong Kong did not allow for any political participation by the local population. Prior to the territory's return to China, however, the United Kingdom and the prospective new sovereign agreed that both the legislature and executive of the future Hong Kong would be determined by elections. China further specified that, as an ultimate aim, these elections would be based on universal suffrage. Yet in the years since, China has intervened in the supposedly autonomous region to slow down or halt constitutional development. While these interventions contravene the constitutional provisions of the Special Administrative Region, they should not come as a surprise; nor do they represent a change in Chinese attitudes toward Hong Kong. Rather, they reflect the Chinese government's misgivings about free elections-misgivings not unlike those of the British with respect to colonial Hong Kong.
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1156223
Lorenz Langer
affiliation not provided to SSRN
International Journal of Constitutional Law, Vol. 5, Issue 3, pp. 419-452, 2007
Abstract:
For most of its one hundred and fifty years, British rule over Hong Kong did not allow for any political participation by the local population. Prior to the territory's return to China, however, the United Kingdom and the prospective new sovereign agreed that both the legislature and executive of the future Hong Kong would be determined by elections. China further specified that, as an ultimate aim, these elections would be based on universal suffrage. Yet in the years since, China has intervened in the supposedly autonomous region to slow down or halt constitutional development. While these interventions contravene the constitutional provisions of the Special Administrative Region, they should not come as a surprise; nor do they represent a change in Chinese attitudes toward Hong Kong. Rather, they reflect the Chinese government's misgivings about free elections-misgivings not unlike those of the British with respect to colonial Hong Kong.
papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1156223